179 Predicting individual beef cattle water intake.

Abstract As global climate patterns shift and population growth accelerates, optimizing freshwater resource use is critical. Animal agriculture is frequently criticized for its perceived role in excessive water consumption; however, prevailing estimates of beef cattle water intake warrant reassessment. Existing beef cattle water intake standards are based on data collected in 1956, failing to account for decades of genetic progress and management improvements. Recent advances in precision livestock monitoring have provided unprecedented access to high-resolution animal data. However, such installations primarily record feed intake and lack the equipment to measure individual water intake. Machine learning models are well suited for leveraging large feed intake datasets to predict individual water intake in systems where feed intake is measured but water intake is not. We deployed RFID-enabled front-end weighing stations integrated with custom metered waterers at the Reymann Memorial Research, Outreach, and Education Center (REOC) in Wardensville, WV (2019) and the WVU Animal Sciences REOC in Morgantown, WV (2022) alongside Growsafe 8000 feed bunks. These systems facilitated the collection of daily body weight, feed intake, and water intake data at the individual animal level. From 2019-07-08 to 2024-02-16, we evaluated 2,020 animals for individual daily weight, feed intake, and water intake across both research locations. Data collection spanned 1,055 days, covering all months of the year. The dataset encompasses 11 breeds: Angus, Limousin, Angus cross-breed, Charolais, SimAngus, Hereford, Simmental, Charolais cross-breed, Black Hereford, Akaushi Wagyu, and Red Angus. Animal ages ranged from 162 to 753 days. The dataset includes water intake records from 1,255 bulls, 434 steers, and 331 heifers. Hourly climate data were collected from open-source climate stations and transformed into daily summaries of mean, maximum, minimum, and range. The resulting high-resolution dataset was used to train a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN) model, well-suited for modeling longitudinal data. Features were engineered to capture temporal dynamics, cohort effects, and intake distribution patterns. Temporal features included cyclical encoding of month and day-of-year, polynomial transformations of test progression, and lag-based statistics to model intake trends. Pairwise distance metrics (Euclidean, Mahalanobis) and clustering methods characterized intake similarity within cohorts. These transformations enhanced the model’s ability to learn seasonality, group effects, and temporal dependencies in intake behavior. A 70:30 train-test split was used to evaluate model performance. After hyperparameter tuning, the model predicted individual water intake with an RMSE of 5.16 L, an MAE of 4.08 L, and an adjusted R² of 0.72. A generalization gap of 1.08 indicated no major overfitting. Our model can predict individual water intake in systems that only measure individual feed intake, enabling the identification and selection of water-efficient animals and improvement of water use in beef production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.320
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

179 Predicting individual beef cattle water intake.

Ida Holásková, Tylor J Yost, Matthew E. Wilson, Jarred W. Yates et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

179 Predicting individual beef cattle water intake.

Ida Holásková, Tylor J Yost, Matthew E. Wilson, Jarred W. Yates, Deborah Ologunagba, Nathan Blake, Matthew Walker, Eswar ArunKumar Kalaga
article en

Abstract

Abstract As global climate patterns shift and population growth accelerates, optimizing freshwater resource use is critical. Animal agriculture is frequently criticized for its perceived role in excessive water consumption; however, prevailing estimates of beef cattle water intake warrant reassessment. Existing beef cattle water intake standards are based on data collected in 1956, failing to account for decades of genetic progress and management improvements. Recent advances in precision livestock monitoring have provided unprecedented access to high-resolution animal data. However, such installations primarily record feed intake and lack the equipment to measure individual water intake. Machine learning models are well suited for leveraging large feed intake datasets to predict individual water intake in systems where feed intake is measured but water intake is not. We deployed RFID-enabled front-end weighing stations integrated with custom metered waterers at the Reymann Memorial Research, Outreach, and Education Center (REOC) in Wardensville, WV (2019) and the WVU Animal Sciences REOC in Morgantown, WV (2022) alongside Growsafe 8000 feed bunks. These systems facilitated the collection of daily body weight, feed intake, and water intake data at the individual animal level. From 2019-07-08 to 2024-02-16, we evaluated 2,020 animals for individual daily weight, feed intake, and water intake across both research locations. Data collection spanned 1,055 days, covering all months of the year. The dataset encompasses 11 breeds: Angus, Limousin, Angus cross-breed, Charolais, SimAngus, Hereford, Simmental, Charolais cross-breed, Black Hereford, Akaushi Wagyu, and Red Angus. Animal ages ranged from 162 to 753 days. The dataset includes water intake records from 1,255 bulls, 434 steers, and 331 heifers. Hourly climate data were collected from open-source climate stations and transformed into daily summaries of mean, maximum, minimum, and range. The resulting high-resolution dataset was used to train a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN) model, well-suited for modeling longitudinal data. Features were engineered to capture temporal dynamics, cohort effects, and intake distribution patterns. Temporal features included cyclical encoding of month and day-of-year, polynomial transformations of test progression, and lag-based statistics to model intake trends. Pairwise distance metrics (Euclidean, Mahalanobis) and clustering methods characterized intake similarity within cohorts. These transformations enhanced the model’s ability to learn seasonality, group effects, and temporal dependencies in intake behavior. A 70:30 train-test split was used to evaluate model performance. After hyperparameter tuning, the model predicted individual water intake with an RMSE of 5.16 L, an MAE of 4.08 L, and an adjusted R² of 0.72. A generalization gap of 1.08 indicated no major overfitting. Our model can predict individual water intake in systems that only measure individual feed intake, enabling the identification and selection of water-efficient animals and improvement of water use in beef production systems.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 103(Supplement_3)
West Virginia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.