289 Efficacy of increasing levels of a urea-biuret mixture on beef cattle performance and enteric methane emissions.

Abstract Supplementation with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) has been used as an alternative to supply nitrogen in low-protein diets for ruminants. Urea is the primary source of NPN supplemented to cattle, but its rapid degradation rate in the rumen limits the inclusion level due to risks of ammonia toxicity. However, novel NPN formulations that include a mixture of urea and biuret (UB) result in lower degradation rates, which may allow for higher inclusion levels than urea alone. Thus, it was hypothesized that by using UB, the inclusion of NPN can be increased in beef cattle diets without impairing production efficiency or safety. The objective of this study was to evaluate urea supplementation at 1% and increasing inclusions of UB on beef steers performance and enteric methane (CH4) emissions. To this end, 128 Angus-crossbred steers were used in a generalized randomized block design. Treatments were composed of a corn-silage basal diet supplemented with urea at 1% of the diet dry matter (DM) (U1), or supplemented with UB at 1.12% (UB1), 2.24% (UB2), or 4.48% (UB4) of the diet DM. The experimental period consisted of 24 d of adaptation, followed by 86 d of performance data collection, and 5 d of enteric CH4 emissions measurements using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. No differences in dry matter intake were observed among treatments (P = 0.41). The UB4 treatment decrease average daily gain (ADG) when compared with U1 (P = 0.05), while no differences were observed among U1, UB1 and UB2. Similarly, gain to feed ratio decreased for the UB4 treatment when compared with U (P = 0.005), though no differences were observed among U1, UB1 and UB2. Total CH4 emission rate (g/d) and CH4 intensity (g/kg ADG), were not affected by treatments (P > 0.05). In conclusion, UB supported equivalent performance to U, when included at 1.12% or 2.24% of the diet DM without compromising efficiency or increasing CH4 emissions. However, the highest inclusion level (4.48%) impaired feed efficiency. These results demonstrate that UB formulation allows NPN supplementation at higher dietary inclusion levels than conventional urea, thereby expanding the safety margin of NPN utilization in beef cattle diets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.333
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

289 Efficacy of increasing levels of a urea-biuret mixture on beef cattle performance and enteric methane emissions.

Mariana Larrauri, Araceli B Maderal, Wilmer Cuervo, Tessa M M Schulmeister et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

289 Efficacy of increasing levels of a urea-biuret mixture on beef cattle performance and enteric methane emissions.

Mariana Larrauri, Araceli B Maderal, Wilmer Cuervo, Tessa M M Schulmeister, Camila Gómez-López, Federico Podversich, Federico Tarnonsky, Ignacio Fernández-Marenchino, I. Ruíz, Liza Garcia, Nicolás DiLorenzo, Georgia J Dubeux, Tomas Andres Soto, Andrés Fernández-Lehmann, Ignacio R Ipharaguerre, Andres Lacherre
article en

Abstract

Abstract Supplementation with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) has been used as an alternative to supply nitrogen in low-protein diets for ruminants. Urea is the primary source of NPN supplemented to cattle, but its rapid degradation rate in the rumen limits the inclusion level due to risks of ammonia toxicity. However, novel NPN formulations that include a mixture of urea and biuret (UB) result in lower degradation rates, which may allow for higher inclusion levels than urea alone. Thus, it was hypothesized that by using UB, the inclusion of NPN can be increased in beef cattle diets without impairing production efficiency or safety. The objective of this study was to evaluate urea supplementation at 1% and increasing inclusions of UB on beef steers performance and enteric methane (CH4) emissions. To this end, 128 Angus-crossbred steers were used in a generalized randomized block design. Treatments were composed of a corn-silage basal diet supplemented with urea at 1% of the diet dry matter (DM) (U1), or supplemented with UB at 1.12% (UB1), 2.24% (UB2), or 4.48% (UB4) of the diet DM. The experimental period consisted of 24 d of adaptation, followed by 86 d of performance data collection, and 5 d of enteric CH4 emissions measurements using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. No differences in dry matter intake were observed among treatments (P = 0.41). The UB4 treatment decrease average daily gain (ADG) when compared with U1 (P = 0.05), while no differences were observed among U1, UB1 and UB2. Similarly, gain to feed ratio decreased for the UB4 treatment when compared with U (P = 0.005), though no differences were observed among U1, UB1 and UB2. Total CH4 emission rate (g/d) and CH4 intensity (g/kg ADG), were not affected by treatments (P > 0.05). In conclusion, UB supported equivalent performance to U, when included at 1.12% or 2.24% of the diet DM without compromising efficiency or increasing CH4 emissions. However, the highest inclusion level (4.48%) impaired feed efficiency. These results demonstrate that UB formulation allows NPN supplementation at higher dietary inclusion levels than conventional urea, thereby expanding the safety margin of NPN utilization in beef cattle diets.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 103(Supplement_3)
South Dakota State University (US), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), University of Florida (US), Yara (Norway) (NO), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.