279 Building trust in science: Considerations from a reviewer’s perspective.

Abstract Peer review is a critical step in scientific publication, ensuring the accuracy, quality, and validity of published research. The role of the reviewer is integral to that process. Reviewers help ensure that research has met expectations for the standards of a scientific publication. They consider the accuracy and rigor of the experimental design, analysis, and interpretation of results. Reviewers identify ethical concerns, errors, and/or biases in the presented work. Reviewers can also comment on the impact the research may have on the field. Importantly, reviewers help improve both the research and the presentation of the research through constructive feedback to authors and editors. However, reviewing is not without challenges. Many reviewers may have conscious or unconscious biases and/or conflicts of interest. Reviewers may also struggle to find the time to thoroughly review manuscripts. Ethical, critical, and thorough review helps uphold the credibility and integrity of scientific publications, building trust in science.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.067
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

279 Building trust in science: Considerations from a reviewer’s perspective.

Sarah E. Reed
Journal of Animal Science
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

279 Building trust in science: Considerations from a reviewer’s perspective.

Sarah E. Reed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Peer review is a critical step in scientific publication, ensuring the accuracy, quality, and validity of published research. The role of the reviewer is integral to that process. Reviewers help ensure that research has met expectations for the standards of a scientific publication. They consider the accuracy and rigor of the experimental design, analysis, and interpretation of results. Reviewers identify ethical concerns, errors, and/or biases in the presented work. Reviewers can also comment on the impact the research may have on the field. Importantly, reviewers help improve both the research and the presentation of the research through constructive feedback to authors and editors. However, reviewing is not without challenges. Many reviewers may have conscious or unconscious biases and/or conflicts of interest. Reviewers may also struggle to find the time to thoroughly review manuscripts. Ethical, critical, and thorough review helps uphold the credibility and integrity of scientific publications, building trust in science.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 103(Supplement_3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.