370 Liquid supplement with pure molasses and essential oils reduced daily CH4 emissions by 10% in beef steers.

Abstract Methane (CH4) is the largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted from livestock production, prompting continuous efforts to reduce emissions and discover new methods for its mitigation. Plants containing essential oils (EOs) have been researched vastly for their anti-methanogenic effects when supplemented to ruminants. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a molasses-essential oil mixture offered free-choice on CH4 emissions from beef cattle. A total of 40 steers were randomly assigned to a control (no liquid supplement) or a molasses-EO treatment group. Both groups received a diet of oaten hay, provided through electronic feeders (Intergado Ltd, Betim, MG, Brazil) and barley-based pellets delivered via a GreenFeed unit (GF; C-Lock inc., Rapid City, SD, USA). Dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and water consumption were measured using the Intergado® system, while GHG emissions were quantified using the GF system. The molasses-EO supplement was not provided during the first week for baseline measurements, and it was then diluted with pure molasses and provided free-choice and to allow for ad-libitum consumption to the treatment group for 56 days resulting in an average intake of 0.6 ± 0.02 kg DM d-1. A mixed-effects linear regression model was used, with animal as the random effect, and period (baseline and treatment), treatment (control and molasses-EO), and their interaction as fixed effects. Logarithmic transformations were performed on hydrogen and supplement intake data to normalise their distributions, and the raw data was filtered for illogical values before analysis. Period summary values were calculated for each variable and significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and tendencies discussed at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10. During the treatment period, steers fed molasses-EO had greater total DMI (7.8 vs 7.2 ± 0.21 kg d-1), metabolizable energy intake (63.1 vs 54.0 ± MJ ME d-1), water soluble carbohydrates intake (0.7 vs 0.3 ± 0.01 kg d-1), crude protein intake (0.6 vs 0.5 ± 0.001 kg d-1), and water intake (60.0 vs 33.2 ± 2.18 L d-1), compared to the control steers, respectively (P < 0.05). Molasses-EO steers had 10% lower daily CH4 (195.9 vs 211.7 ± 5.46 g d-1) and lower CH4 intensity (269.7 vs 700 ± 190.22 g kg-1 ADG; P < 0.05) compared to control. No differences between treatments were observed in the baseline period (P > 0.05), and no detrimental effects on animal performance or health were observed. Research with longer feeding periods is encouraged. A new delivery method of supplementation for forage-fed animals using plant extracts containing essential oils mixed with molasses presents another promising tool for cattle producers to implement more environmentally friendly livestock management practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.093
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

370 Liquid supplement with pure molasses and essential oils reduced daily CH4 emissions by 10% in beef steers.

Alex V. Chaves, L. A. González, Gamaliel Simanungkalit, Katerina Stasinopoulou
Journal of Animal Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

370 Liquid supplement with pure molasses and essential oils reduced daily CH4 emissions by 10% in beef steers.

Alex V. Chaves, L. A. González, Gamaliel Simanungkalit, Katerina Stasinopoulou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Methane (CH4) is the largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted from livestock production, prompting continuous efforts to reduce emissions and discover new methods for its mitigation. Plants containing essential oils (EOs) have been researched vastly for their anti-methanogenic effects when supplemented to ruminants. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a molasses-essential oil mixture offered free-choice on CH4 emissions from beef cattle. A total of 40 steers were randomly assigned to a control (no liquid supplement) or a molasses-EO treatment group. Both groups received a diet of oaten hay, provided through electronic feeders (Intergado Ltd, Betim, MG, Brazil) and barley-based pellets delivered via a GreenFeed unit (GF; C-Lock inc., Rapid City, SD, USA). Dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and water consumption were measured using the Intergado® system, while GHG emissions were quantified using the GF system. The molasses-EO supplement was not provided during the first week for baseline measurements, and it was then diluted with pure molasses and provided free-choice and to allow for ad-libitum consumption to the treatment group for 56 days resulting in an average intake of 0.6 ± 0.02 kg DM d-1. A mixed-effects linear regression model was used, with animal as the random effect, and period (baseline and treatment), treatment (control and molasses-EO), and their interaction as fixed effects. Logarithmic transformations were performed on hydrogen and supplement intake data to normalise their distributions, and the raw data was filtered for illogical values before analysis. Period summary values were calculated for each variable and significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and tendencies discussed at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10. During the treatment period, steers fed molasses-EO had greater total DMI (7.8 vs 7.2 ± 0.21 kg d-1), metabolizable energy intake (63.1 vs 54.0 ± MJ ME d-1), water soluble carbohydrates intake (0.7 vs 0.3 ± 0.01 kg d-1), crude protein intake (0.6 vs 0.5 ± 0.001 kg d-1), and water intake (60.0 vs 33.2 ± 2.18 L d-1), compared to the control steers, respectively (P < 0.05). Molasses-EO steers had 10% lower daily CH4 (195.9 vs 211.7 ± 5.46 g d-1) and lower CH4 intensity (269.7 vs 700 ± 190.22 g kg-1 ADG; P < 0.05) compared to control. No differences between treatments were observed in the baseline period (P > 0.05), and no detrimental effects on animal performance or health were observed. Research with longer feeding periods is encouraged. A new delivery method of supplementation for forage-fed animals using plant extracts containing essential oils mixed with molasses presents another promising tool for cattle producers to implement more environmentally friendly livestock management practices.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 103(Supplement_3)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.