UEG Week 2025 Oral Presentations

Introduction: Gastric outlet obstruction is a common manifestation of advanced gastric, duodenal, and periampullary malignancies, severely affecting quality of life.Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) may be superior to surgical gastroenterostomy (SGJ) as palliative treatment for this condition, but randomised trials are currently lacking. Aims & Methods:We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving palliative patients with a malignant obstruction localized between the pylorus and the distal duodenum, randomizing them 1:1 to either EUS-GE or SGJ.The first co-primary superiority end point was time to solid oral intake.The second co-primary non-inferiority end point was persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms for which a reintervention was required within six months after treatment.The predefined non-inferiority margin was 20%.Results: From February 2022 to February 2024, 250 patients were screened in 12 participating hospitals in the Netherlands.Of the 98 enrolled patients, 48 were assigned to EUS-GE and 50 were assigned to SGJ.Median age was 69 versus 70 years and the most prevalent etiology was pancreatic cancer in 58% versus 50% in the EUS-GE group and SGJ group, respectively.Median time to oral intake was significantly shorter in the EUS-GE group compared to the SGJ group: 1 day versus 3 days (hazard ratio, 2.21, 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.42, p=0.0003).In the endoscopic group, 5 patients (10%) experienced persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms requiring reintervention, compared with 6 patients (12%) in the surgical group (risk difference, 1.6%, upper limit of 90% CI, 8.9%).Clinical success, defined as the ability to tolerate solid oral intake, was higher in the EUS-GE group (96% versus 80%, relative risk, 1.20, 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.39).Median length of hospital stay was shorter in the EUS-GE group (1 day versus 4 days, relative change, 0.46, 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.78).Serious adverse events, defined as Clavien-Dindo 3B, were observed in 8% of patients in the EUS-GE group and in 12% of patients in the SGJ group (relative risk, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.21 to 2.31).Median survival was 91 days after EUS-GE (95% CI, 74 to 140) and 74 days (95% CI, 46 to 110) after SGJ.Thirty-day mortality was 13% in the EUS-GE group and 26% in the SGJ group (relative risk, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.14).In the first three months following the procedure, quality of life was not different between the two treatments. Conclusion:This trial showed that EUS-GE, compared to SGJ, is superior in terms of time to solid oral intake and non-inferior with regards to the rate of persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms requiring reintervention.Based on these results, EUS-GE should be the preferred palliative treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

Publication Details

Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70032
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UEG Week 2025 Oral Presentations

United European Gastroenterology Journal
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

UEG Week 2025 Oral Presentations

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric outlet obstruction is a common manifestation of advanced gastric, duodenal, and periampullary malignancies, severely affecting quality of life.Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) may be superior to surgical gastroenterostomy (SGJ) as palliative treatment for this condition, but randomised trials are currently lacking. Aims & Methods:We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving palliative patients with a malignant obstruction localized between the pylorus and the distal duodenum, randomizing them 1:1 to either EUS-GE or SGJ.The first co-primary superiority end point was time to solid oral intake.The second co-primary non-inferiority end point was persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms for which a reintervention was required within six months after treatment.The predefined non-inferiority margin was 20%.Results: From February 2022 to February 2024, 250 patients were screened in 12 participating hospitals in the Netherlands.Of the 98 enrolled patients, 48 were assigned to EUS-GE and 50 were assigned to SGJ.Median age was 69 versus 70 years and the most prevalent etiology was pancreatic cancer in 58% versus 50% in the EUS-GE group and SGJ group, respectively.Median time to oral intake was significantly shorter in the EUS-GE group compared to the SGJ group: 1 day versus 3 days (hazard ratio, 2.21, 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.42, p=0.0003).In the endoscopic group, 5 patients (10%) experienced persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms requiring reintervention, compared with 6 patients (12%) in the surgical group (risk difference, 1.6%, upper limit of 90% CI, 8.9%).Clinical success, defined as the ability to tolerate solid oral intake, was higher in the EUS-GE group (96% versus 80%, relative risk, 1.20, 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.39).Median length of hospital stay was shorter in the EUS-GE group (1 day versus 4 days, relative change, 0.46, 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.78).Serious adverse events, defined as Clavien-Dindo 3B, were observed in 8% of patients in the EUS-GE group and in 12% of patients in the SGJ group (relative risk, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.21 to 2.31).Median survival was 91 days after EUS-GE (95% CI, 74 to 140) and 74 days (95% CI, 46 to 110) after SGJ.Thirty-day mortality was 13% in the EUS-GE group and 26% in the SGJ group (relative risk, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.14).In the first three months following the procedure, quality of life was not different between the two treatments. Conclusion:This trial showed that EUS-GE, compared to SGJ, is superior in terms of time to solid oral intake and non-inferior with regards to the rate of persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms requiring reintervention.Based on these results, EUS-GE should be the preferred palliative treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

United European Gastroenterology JournalVol. 13(S8)
Boston Scientific Corporation, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Cook Medical, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Universiteit Leiden, Radboud Universiteit, Universität Wien, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Medizinische Universität Wien, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Medizinische Universität Graz, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla, Sorbonne Université, BioTechMed-Graz, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Servicio Gallego de Salud
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.