How do Chinese-English Learners Process Metaphorical Actions

Bodily action plays a crucial role in human interaction with the world and provides a foundation for comprehending abstract concepts. This study examined how Chinese-English speakers process familiar and less familiar metaphorical actions. Using a sentence-priming paradigm, participants read action-related sentences (literal, familiar metaphorical, and less familiar metaphorical), each immediately followed by a target word associated with either the verb’s literal or figurative meaning. Participants performed a lexical decision task by pressing response keys. Results showed that familiar metaphorical action sentences facilitated recognition of target words related to figurative meanings compared to control words, whereas less familiar metaphorical action sentences facilitated recognition of target words related to literal meanings. These findings suggest that Chinese-English speakers process familiar and less familiar metaphorical actions differently and provide support for the Graded Salience Hypothesis of figurative language processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52843/cassyni.8ym5kt
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do Chinese-English Learners Process Metaphorical Actions

Mingming Li
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

How do Chinese-English Learners Process Metaphorical Actions

Mingming Li
article en

Abstract

Bodily action plays a crucial role in human interaction with the world and provides a foundation for comprehending abstract concepts. This study examined how Chinese-English speakers process familiar and less familiar metaphorical actions. Using a sentence-priming paradigm, participants read action-related sentences (literal, familiar metaphorical, and less familiar metaphorical), each immediately followed by a target word associated with either the verb’s literal or figurative meaning. Participants performed a lexical decision task by pressing response keys. Results showed that familiar metaphorical action sentences facilitated recognition of target words related to figurative meanings compared to control words, whereas less familiar metaphorical action sentences facilitated recognition of target words related to literal meanings. These findings suggest that Chinese-English speakers process familiar and less familiar metaphorical actions differently and provide support for the Graded Salience Hypothesis of figurative language processing.

Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Victoria University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How do Chinese-English Learners Process Metaphorical Actions — Mingming Li · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS