Burdened Relationality: A Critical Examination of the Paternalism Inherent in the Care Ethics of Posthumanism

This essay examines the paternalism embedded in care ethics within post-humanist thought, focusing on Sunaura Taylor’s “Beasts of Burden.” Though care appears morally necessary, it often sustains the hierarchies it aims to undo. When filtered through humanist values, care can infantilize marginalized beings and reinforce their dependence. The essay critiques this dynamic through 3 lenses: Indigenous reciprocity, the production of the corpse, and new materialist assemblages. These frameworks expose how able-bodied humans assign worth and decide who receives care. The result is a selective, conditional ethics that centers on human benefit. True post-humanist care, the essay argues, demands a collapse of anthropocentric boundaries; it calls for co-agency, not management. In this, reciprocity must replace domination. All beings, human and non-human, ought to be recognized as active participants in care, not passive recipients. Only then can we move beyond moral control toward ethical coexistence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Undergraduate Review
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/psur398
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Burdened Relationality: A Critical Examination of the Paternalism Inherent in the Care Ethics of Posthumanism

Phoenix Hunstein
Political Science Undergraduate Review
Ethics in medical practice
article

Burdened Relationality: A Critical Examination of the Paternalism Inherent in the Care Ethics of Posthumanism

Phoenix Hunstein
article en

Abstract

This essay examines the paternalism embedded in care ethics within post-humanist thought, focusing on Sunaura Taylor’s “Beasts of Burden.” Though care appears morally necessary, it often sustains the hierarchies it aims to undo. When filtered through humanist values, care can infantilize marginalized beings and reinforce their dependence. The essay critiques this dynamic through 3 lenses: Indigenous reciprocity, the production of the corpse, and new materialist assemblages. These frameworks expose how able-bodied humans assign worth and decide who receives care. The result is a selective, conditional ethics that centers on human benefit. True post-humanist care, the essay argues, demands a collapse of anthropocentric boundaries; it calls for co-agency, not management. In this, reciprocity must replace domination. All beings, human and non-human, ought to be recognized as active participants in care, not passive recipients. Only then can we move beyond moral control toward ethical coexistence.

Political Science Undergraduate ReviewVol. 10(1)
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.