Integrated assessment of the costs and benefits of reactive nitrogen emission and mitigation: a methodological review and framework proposal

Reactive nitrogen (N r ) emissions represent one of the most pressing challenges at the interface of environment, human health, and climate, yet their assessment remains methodologically fragmented and geographically uneven. This review synthesizes 398 studies from environmental science, environmental economics, agricultural systems, epidemiology, and ecosystem ecology published between 2000-2025 to evaluate the costs and benefits of nitrogen emissions and mitigation strategies. The methodological approaches discussed include emission inventories, cost-benefit analysis, and integrated assessment models that connect environmental and economic outcomes. We found that despite progress achieved through expanding global and regional studies, significant fragmentation persists in nitrogen assessment approaches, limiting the potential to provide generalizable insights and coherent policy recommendations. Moreover, comprehensive cost-benefit assessments of nitrogen management are often underdeveloped, with significant uncertainties and a lack of integration across environmental, economic, and societal dimensions. Building on this analysis, we propose an integrated nitrogen assessment framework (INAF) that systematically connects emission quantification, impact evaluation, mitigation cost and benefit analysis. This framework provides a pathway toward more comprehensive, transparent, and policy-relevant assessments. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for harmonized methodologies, cross-scale integration, and stronger interdisciplinary collaboration. By identifying knowledge gaps and outlining future directions, this review aims to accelerate the development of robust and actionable strategies for sustainable nitrogen management. • Comprehensive review of nitrogen emission and mitigation assessment methods. • Identifies key methodological and data gaps across sectors and scales. • Proposes an integrated assessment framework for Nitrogen. • Supports evidence-based nitrogen management and policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Critical Zone
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecz.2025.100047
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated assessment of the costs and benefits of reactive nitrogen emission and mitigation: a methodological review and framework proposal

Zbigniew Klimont, Hans J. M. van Grinsven, Deli Chen, Xiuming Zhang et al.
Earth Critical Zone
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Integrated assessment of the costs and benefits of reactive nitrogen emission and mitigation: a methodological review and framework proposal

Zbigniew Klimont, Hans J. M. van Grinsven, Deli Chen, Xiuming Zhang, Wilfried Winiwarter, Shaohui Zhang
article en

Abstract

Reactive nitrogen (N r ) emissions represent one of the most pressing challenges at the interface of environment, human health, and climate, yet their assessment remains methodologically fragmented and geographically uneven. This review synthesizes 398 studies from environmental science, environmental economics, agricultural systems, epidemiology, and ecosystem ecology published between 2000-2025 to evaluate the costs and benefits of nitrogen emissions and mitigation strategies. The methodological approaches discussed include emission inventories, cost-benefit analysis, and integrated assessment models that connect environmental and economic outcomes. We found that despite progress achieved through expanding global and regional studies, significant fragmentation persists in nitrogen assessment approaches, limiting the potential to provide generalizable insights and coherent policy recommendations. Moreover, comprehensive cost-benefit assessments of nitrogen management are often underdeveloped, with significant uncertainties and a lack of integration across environmental, economic, and societal dimensions. Building on this analysis, we propose an integrated nitrogen assessment framework (INAF) that systematically connects emission quantification, impact evaluation, mitigation cost and benefit analysis. This framework provides a pathway toward more comprehensive, transparent, and policy-relevant assessments. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for harmonized methodologies, cross-scale integration, and stronger interdisciplinary collaboration. By identifying knowledge gaps and outlining future directions, this review aims to accelerate the development of robust and actionable strategies for sustainable nitrogen management. • Comprehensive review of nitrogen emission and mitigation assessment methods. • Identifies key methodological and data gaps across sectors and scales. • Proposes an integrated assessment framework for Nitrogen. • Supports evidence-based nitrogen management and policy design.

Earth Critical ZoneVol. 2
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), The University of Melbourne (AU), Institute of Environmental Engineering (PL), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), University of Zielona Góra (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.