Can natural capital help national-level policy-makers to embed sustainability considerations? Insights from Scotland

Natural Capital is a concept expected to help tackle the perennial challenge of ‘mainstreaming’ nature, so that all sectors' decisions reflect nature's importance. This includes the public sector, as Natural Capital is affected by and relevant to a variety of policy goals. This study presents the first survey of policy-makers views of Natural Capital in Scotland. We received responses from 50 policy-makers from a range of departments and roles in Scotland's civil service. We found there was generally familiarity with Natural Capital but a lack of familiarity or confidence in working with it, even though some data and policy-oriented tools are available. Our respondents generally agreed more needed to be done to embed sustainability considerations in policy development: indicating that more tools and data could be relevant, but also other institutional changes. This study suggests we cannot rely on solely on the provision of Natural Capital tools or data to embed sustainability issues in policy development. Initiatives such as training and providing case studies can help complement tools: there is also a need to consider institutional capacity and appetite to adapt working processes. Transdisciplinary appraisal of a mixture of interventions will help future efforts to embed sustainability considerations in policy-making. • We surveyed 50 Scottish policy-makers' views on Natural Capital (NC) & sustainability • They are familiar with NC but so far rarely work with related data or tools • They supported doing more to embed sustainability considerations in policy • Data and tools were desired; but also other changes such as leadership & capacity • Future efforts to work with NC should be supported by transdisciplinary appraisal

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108815
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can natural capital help national-level policy-makers to embed sustainability considerations? Insights from Scotland

Esther Carmen, Kerry A. Waylen, Ishaan Patil
1 citations
Ecological Economics
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Can natural capital help national-level policy-makers to embed sustainability considerations? Insights from Scotland

Esther Carmen, Kerry A. Waylen, Ishaan Patil
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Natural Capital is a concept expected to help tackle the perennial challenge of ‘mainstreaming’ nature, so that all sectors' decisions reflect nature's importance. This includes the public sector, as Natural Capital is affected by and relevant to a variety of policy goals. This study presents the first survey of policy-makers views of Natural Capital in Scotland. We received responses from 50 policy-makers from a range of departments and roles in Scotland's civil service. We found there was generally familiarity with Natural Capital but a lack of familiarity or confidence in working with it, even though some data and policy-oriented tools are available. Our respondents generally agreed more needed to be done to embed sustainability considerations in policy development: indicating that more tools and data could be relevant, but also other institutional changes. This study suggests we cannot rely on solely on the provision of Natural Capital tools or data to embed sustainability issues in policy development. Initiatives such as training and providing case studies can help complement tools: there is also a need to consider institutional capacity and appetite to adapt working processes. Transdisciplinary appraisal of a mixture of interventions will help future efforts to embed sustainability considerations in policy-making. • We surveyed 50 Scottish policy-makers' views on Natural Capital (NC) & sustainability • They are familiar with NC but so far rarely work with related data or tools • They supported doing more to embed sustainability considerations in policy • Data and tools were desired; but also other changes such as leadership & capacity • Future efforts to work with NC should be supported by transdisciplinary appraisal

Ecological EconomicsVol. 240
James Hutton Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.