Role overload and safety incidents: An examination of the individual- and team-level buffering effects of psychological safety

• Role overload positively relates to safety incidents, but this effect is conditional on psychological safety. • The first study to show that team-level psychological safety buffers the effects of role overload on safety incidents. • While there was no individual-level buffering, psychological safety directly reduces safety incidents. A supportive work environment benefits employees and their organizations, and is particularly important for safety outcomes. In this paper we respond to calls in the literature to examine the moderating effects of individual- and team-level psychological safety on the relationship between role overload and safety incidents. Drawing on conservation of resources theory, we proposed that role overload would be positively related to safety incidents. Second, we proposed a multi-level interaction model where individual- and team-level psychological safety attenuate the positive relationship between role overload and safety incidents. Using data obtained from 841 employees nested in 100 teams, our multi-level analyses revealed that role overload positively relates to safety incidents and that psychological safety is a team-, rather than an individual-, level moderating resource that confers protection for employees by buffering the effects of role overload on safety incidents. We also found a main effect for individual-level psychological safety, with higher levels of psychological safety associated with fewer incidents. Based on our findings, employees should individually and collectively invest resources to create a climate of psychological safety to protect themselves and their colleagues from the negative safety implications of role overload. Leaders are advised to focus on interventions to enhance team-level psychological safety including supportive environments to encourage team cohesion, initiative taking, accountability, and via their leadership development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107008
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role overload and safety incidents: An examination of the individual- and team-level buffering effects of psychological safety

Brian Cooper, Helen De Cieri, Tracey Shea, Cathy Sheehan et al.
Safety Science
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Role overload and safety incidents: An examination of the individual- and team-level buffering effects of psychological safety

Brian Cooper, Helen De Cieri, Tracey Shea, Cathy Sheehan, Ross Donohue
article en

Abstract

• Role overload positively relates to safety incidents, but this effect is conditional on psychological safety. • The first study to show that team-level psychological safety buffers the effects of role overload on safety incidents. • While there was no individual-level buffering, psychological safety directly reduces safety incidents. A supportive work environment benefits employees and their organizations, and is particularly important for safety outcomes. In this paper we respond to calls in the literature to examine the moderating effects of individual- and team-level psychological safety on the relationship between role overload and safety incidents. Drawing on conservation of resources theory, we proposed that role overload would be positively related to safety incidents. Second, we proposed a multi-level interaction model where individual- and team-level psychological safety attenuate the positive relationship between role overload and safety incidents. Using data obtained from 841 employees nested in 100 teams, our multi-level analyses revealed that role overload positively relates to safety incidents and that psychological safety is a team-, rather than an individual-, level moderating resource that confers protection for employees by buffering the effects of role overload on safety incidents. We also found a main effect for individual-level psychological safety, with higher levels of psychological safety associated with fewer incidents. Based on our findings, employees should individually and collectively invest resources to create a climate of psychological safety to protect themselves and their colleagues from the negative safety implications of role overload. Leaders are advised to focus on interventions to enhance team-level psychological safety including supportive environments to encourage team cohesion, initiative taking, accountability, and via their leadership development.

Safety ScienceVol. 193
Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Role overload and safety incidents: An examination of the individual- and team-level buffering effects of psychological safety — Brian Cooper, Helen De Cieri, et al. · Safety Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS