Status and trends of Germany’s urban biodiversity: A nationwide assessment and identified knowledge gaps

Knowledge on the status and trends of biodiversity in urban areas is scattered and biased towards a few taxonomic groups, despite the fact that cities are where most humans get in touch with nature today. As part of the German Biodiversity Assessment (‘Faktencheck Artenvielfalt’), we conducted a nationwide review of published studies that recorded species occurrences in urban areas in Germany. We found that urban areas can host a large proportion of all plant, animal, and fungal species found in Germany, thus contributing to the nationwide conservation of biodiversity. However, compared to other habitat types outside of cities, the number of studies analysing the status and trends of urban biodiversity is relatively small. We could not identify a general trend over time for species diversity in German cities, based on the available studies. Even within individual species groups, there are combinations of declining, positive, and/or neutral trends. Information on population trends remains limited. Similarly, evidence of whether urbanisation promotes the homogenisation or differentiation of species groups is weak, with those groups investigated more thoroughly showing mixed patterns. With regard to biodiversity promotion, preserving the environmental heterogeneity that contributes to biodiversity is important, such as the maintenance of various habitat types (forests, parks, gardens, ponds, streams, etc.) that offer various food and nesting resources. Hence, the proportion of built-up impervious areas must remain limited, i.e. must not increase, and additional measures to promote biodiversity must be implemented. However, local authorities are largely ill-equipped to systematically monitor species occurrence across the variety of habitat types, or elements of green-blue infrastructure and taxonomic groups in cities. We discuss these findings, considering international urban biodiversity assessments and suggest key attributes of an effective national monitoring system to support urban biodiversity conservation and enhancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Basic and Applied Ecology
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2025.10.002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Status and trends of Germany’s urban biodiversity: A nationwide assessment and identified knowledge gaps

André Mascarenhas, Christian Albert, Maria Sporbert, Thilo Wellmann et al.
1 citations
Basic and Applied Ecology
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Status and trends of Germany’s urban biodiversity: A nationwide assessment and identified knowledge gaps

André Mascarenhas, Christian Albert, Maria Sporbert, Thilo Wellmann, Tanja M. Straka, Christoph Bleidorn, Dagmar Haase, Michael W. Strohbach, Willi E. R. Xylander, Christian Ristok, Leonie Katharina Fischer, Jori Maylin Marx, Sonja Knapp, Josef Kaiser, Stephanie Kramer‐Schadt, Monika Egerer, Peter Keil
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Knowledge on the status and trends of biodiversity in urban areas is scattered and biased towards a few taxonomic groups, despite the fact that cities are where most humans get in touch with nature today. As part of the German Biodiversity Assessment (‘Faktencheck Artenvielfalt’), we conducted a nationwide review of published studies that recorded species occurrences in urban areas in Germany. We found that urban areas can host a large proportion of all plant, animal, and fungal species found in Germany, thus contributing to the nationwide conservation of biodiversity. However, compared to other habitat types outside of cities, the number of studies analysing the status and trends of urban biodiversity is relatively small. We could not identify a general trend over time for species diversity in German cities, based on the available studies. Even within individual species groups, there are combinations of declining, positive, and/or neutral trends. Information on population trends remains limited. Similarly, evidence of whether urbanisation promotes the homogenisation or differentiation of species groups is weak, with those groups investigated more thoroughly showing mixed patterns. With regard to biodiversity promotion, preserving the environmental heterogeneity that contributes to biodiversity is important, such as the maintenance of various habitat types (forests, parks, gardens, ponds, streams, etc.) that offer various food and nesting resources. Hence, the proportion of built-up impervious areas must remain limited, i.e. must not increase, and additional measures to promote biodiversity must be implemented. However, local authorities are largely ill-equipped to systematically monitor species occurrence across the variety of habitat types, or elements of green-blue infrastructure and taxonomic groups in cities. We discuss these findings, considering international urban biodiversity assessments and suggest key attributes of an effective national monitoring system to support urban biodiversity conservation and enhancement.

Basic and Applied EcologyVol. 89
University of Stuttgart (DE), Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Institut für biologische Forschung (DE), Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz (DE), Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Leipzig University (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.