Quantifying microbial and harmful algal bloom interactions dynamics through machine learning predictive frameworks

Harmful algal bloom (HAB) mitigation using microorganisms faces challenges, like inconsistent algicidal efficacy, scalability issues, limited microbial diversity, and traditional modeling constraints. To address these challenges, for the first time, this study investigates the quantitative impacts of microorganisms on HABs using machine learning (ML). We conducted an analysis of over 100 microbial species, laying the foundation to optimize treatments for more consistent outcomes. Our findings showed that these microorganisms exhibited an average algicidal ratio of 71 ​% against HABs. Random Forest, Bagging, and Extreme Gradient Boosting Regressors ML models demonstrated robust predictive performance for algicidal ratios. Nonlinear relationships with time, microbial concentrations, and algal biomass were observed. Optimal culture time for maximizing algicidal ratios ranged from 7 to 10 days; extending time did not enhance the algicidal process. The optimum concentration of microorganisms was identified as 0.5 ​× ​10 10 ​cells/mL, with higher concentrations showing diminishing returns. Additionally, algal biomass influenced the algicidal process, with a sharp decline in algicidal ratio at low biomass levels (0–1 ​× ​10 7 ​cells/mL), followed by stabilization at higher densities (1.5 ​× ​10 7 ​cells/mL). Algal biomass, culture time, Brevibacillus , microbial concentration, Enterobacter , Microcystis aeruginosa , and Alexandrium tamarense emerged as crucial factors driving microbial algicidal processes against HABs. Overall, ML analysis of microbial impacts on HABs guides effective treatment optimization with future work emphasizing real-world field applications. • Inconsistent data undermine microbes as biocontrol agents for algal blooms. • Sophisticated ML methods provide accurate predictions for algicidal ratios. • The experimental parameters and their interactive effects were thoroughly quantified and validated. • Established thresholds offer improved protection of aquatic ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Biology and Security
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watbs.2025.100503
Primary Topic
Data Stream Mining Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying microbial and harmful algal bloom interactions dynamics through machine learning predictive frameworks

Zobia Khatoon, Suiliang Huang
Water Biology and Security
Data Stream Mining Techniques
article

Quantifying microbial and harmful algal bloom interactions dynamics through machine learning predictive frameworks

Zobia Khatoon, Suiliang Huang
article en

Abstract

Harmful algal bloom (HAB) mitigation using microorganisms faces challenges, like inconsistent algicidal efficacy, scalability issues, limited microbial diversity, and traditional modeling constraints. To address these challenges, for the first time, this study investigates the quantitative impacts of microorganisms on HABs using machine learning (ML). We conducted an analysis of over 100 microbial species, laying the foundation to optimize treatments for more consistent outcomes. Our findings showed that these microorganisms exhibited an average algicidal ratio of 71 ​% against HABs. Random Forest, Bagging, and Extreme Gradient Boosting Regressors ML models demonstrated robust predictive performance for algicidal ratios. Nonlinear relationships with time, microbial concentrations, and algal biomass were observed. Optimal culture time for maximizing algicidal ratios ranged from 7 to 10 days; extending time did not enhance the algicidal process. The optimum concentration of microorganisms was identified as 0.5 ​× ​10 10 ​cells/mL, with higher concentrations showing diminishing returns. Additionally, algal biomass influenced the algicidal process, with a sharp decline in algicidal ratio at low biomass levels (0–1 ​× ​10 7 ​cells/mL), followed by stabilization at higher densities (1.5 ​× ​10 7 ​cells/mL). Algal biomass, culture time, Brevibacillus , microbial concentration, Enterobacter , Microcystis aeruginosa , and Alexandrium tamarense emerged as crucial factors driving microbial algicidal processes against HABs. Overall, ML analysis of microbial impacts on HABs guides effective treatment optimization with future work emphasizing real-world field applications. • Inconsistent data undermine microbes as biocontrol agents for algal blooms. • Sophisticated ML methods provide accurate predictions for algicidal ratios. • The experimental parameters and their interactive effects were thoroughly quantified and validated. • Established thresholds offer improved protection of aquatic ecosystems.

Water Biology and SecurityVol. 5(3)
Nankai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Data Stream Mining Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying microbial and harmful algal bloom interactions dynamics through machine learning predictive frameworks — Zobia Khatoon, Suiliang Huang · Water Biology and Security (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS