Performance comparisons of self-adaptive artificial intelligence control algorithms designed using particle swarm optimization in aircraft takeoff and landing

In this study, adaptive artificial intelligence control algorithms were designed using the particle swarm optimisation (PSO) method for safe take-off and landing of aircraft. The performance of the designed control algorithms, which were applied to the control of the aircraft’s pitch angle, was compared with each other and with studies in the literature. Integrated squared error (ISE) was used as a fitness function in the design of PSO-based proportional–integral–derivative (PSO-PID), PSO-based fuzzy logic controller (PSO-FLC) and PSO-based self-adaptive fuzzy-PID (PSO-SAF-PID) controllers. Performance comparisons between the designed controllers were made based on the transient behaviours such as overshoot, rise time and settling time, and statistical error analyses including mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), ISE and integrated absolute error (IAE). It was observed that the performance of the PID controller, FLC and SAF-PID controllers improved significantly with the application of the PSO method. First, the mathematical model of the system was derived. Second, traditional control methods (PID control algorithm) and artificial intelligence control methods (FLC and SAF-PID type control algorithms) were designed to control the modelled system. Then, to improve the performance of these designed control algorithms, the optimal control parameters of the PID algorithm were determined using the PSO method. At the same time, membership function weight coefficients of the FLC algorithm and SAF-PID type control algorithm were determined using the PSO algorithm. Determining the control parameters and membership function coefficients at optimum values significantly affects the performance of control algorithms. Optimal control parameters and membership coefficients have significantly improved control performance. Furthermore, tests performed on transfer functions with different system parameters have shown that the PSO-SAF-PID controller is robust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312251376232
Primary Topic
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance comparisons of self-adaptive artificial intelligence control algorithms designed using particle swarm optimization in aircraft takeoff and landing

Servet Soygüder, Ahmet Sadık Duru
Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
article

Performance comparisons of self-adaptive artificial intelligence control algorithms designed using particle swarm optimization in aircraft takeoff and landing

Servet Soygüder, Ahmet Sadık Duru
article en

Abstract

In this study, adaptive artificial intelligence control algorithms were designed using the particle swarm optimisation (PSO) method for safe take-off and landing of aircraft. The performance of the designed control algorithms, which were applied to the control of the aircraft’s pitch angle, was compared with each other and with studies in the literature. Integrated squared error (ISE) was used as a fitness function in the design of PSO-based proportional–integral–derivative (PSO-PID), PSO-based fuzzy logic controller (PSO-FLC) and PSO-based self-adaptive fuzzy-PID (PSO-SAF-PID) controllers. Performance comparisons between the designed controllers were made based on the transient behaviours such as overshoot, rise time and settling time, and statistical error analyses including mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), ISE and integrated absolute error (IAE). It was observed that the performance of the PID controller, FLC and SAF-PID controllers improved significantly with the application of the PSO method. First, the mathematical model of the system was derived. Second, traditional control methods (PID control algorithm) and artificial intelligence control methods (FLC and SAF-PID type control algorithms) were designed to control the modelled system. Then, to improve the performance of these designed control algorithms, the optimal control parameters of the PID algorithm were determined using the PSO method. At the same time, membership function weight coefficients of the FLC algorithm and SAF-PID type control algorithm were determined using the PSO algorithm. Determining the control parameters and membership function coefficients at optimum values significantly affects the performance of control algorithms. Optimal control parameters and membership coefficients have significantly improved control performance. Furthermore, tests performed on transfer functions with different system parameters have shown that the PSO-SAF-PID controller is robust.

Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.