Attractive synthetic voices

With recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), synthetic voices have become increasingly prevalent in our everyday soundscape. This study examined listeners’ perception of human and neural Text-To-Speech (TTS) voices. In an online experiment, 75 participants listened to different versions of a short utterance spoken by eight different voices (half human, half TTS), each presented in four expressed emotions (neutral, happy, sad, angry). For each stimulus, participants rated voice attractiveness and willingness to interact, and selected the perceived emotion from a forced-choice list. In a second part, participants were asked to classify each voice as human or AI-generated. Results revealed that participants were often “fooled” by the TTS voices, misidentifying them as human. Voice ratings were influenced by the perceived emotion regardless of the voice type, with happy-sounding voices rated more positively than those perceived as sad or angry. However, TTS voices were rated as less attractive and socially appealing overall, though with large individual differences. These findings indicate that TTS voices are approaching human ones in how they are perceived by listeners, highlighting progress in their naturalness. • Human voices are still rated as more attractive than synthetic ones – but perhaps not for long. • Participants are often fooled by TTS voices, misidentifying them as human. • Perceived emotion influences ratings similarly for human and TTS voices, with strong effect of valence. • Older adults are less accurate in distinguishing TTS from human voices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100211
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attractive synthetic voices

Pauline Larrouy-Maestri, Camila Bruder, Pamela Breda
2 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans
Multisensory perception and integration
4.24
article

Attractive synthetic voices

Pauline Larrouy-Maestri, Camila Bruder, Pamela Breda
article en
2 citations

Abstract

With recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), synthetic voices have become increasingly prevalent in our everyday soundscape. This study examined listeners’ perception of human and neural Text-To-Speech (TTS) voices. In an online experiment, 75 participants listened to different versions of a short utterance spoken by eight different voices (half human, half TTS), each presented in four expressed emotions (neutral, happy, sad, angry). For each stimulus, participants rated voice attractiveness and willingness to interact, and selected the perceived emotion from a forced-choice list. In a second part, participants were asked to classify each voice as human or AI-generated. Results revealed that participants were often “fooled” by the TTS voices, misidentifying them as human. Voice ratings were influenced by the perceived emotion regardless of the voice type, with happy-sounding voices rated more positively than those perceived as sad or angry. However, TTS voices were rated as less attractive and socially appealing overall, though with large individual differences. These findings indicate that TTS voices are approaching human ones in how they are perceived by listeners, highlighting progress in their naturalness. • Human voices are still rated as more attractive than synthetic ones – but perhaps not for long. • Participants are often fooled by TTS voices, misidentifying them as human. • Perceived emotion influences ratings similarly for human and TTS voices, with strong effect of valence. • Older adults are less accurate in distinguishing TTS from human voices.

Computers in Human Behavior Artificial HumansVol. 6
University of Applied Arts Vienna (AT), Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multisensory perception and integration
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.