Constraints are not enough

A bstract The Euclidean Einstein-Hilbert action is well-known to be unbounded below and thus to raise many questions regarding the definition of the gravitational path integral. A variety of works since the late 1980’s have suggested that this problem disappears when one fixes a foliation of the spacetime and imposes the corresponding gravitational constraints. However, we show here that this approach fails with various classes of boundary conditions imposed on the foliation: compact slices without boundary, asymptotically flat, or asymptotically locally anti-de Sitter slices. We also discuss the idea of fixing the scalar curvature and Wick-rotating the conformal factor, and show that it also fails to produce an action bounded from below.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep10(2025)031
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraints are not enough

Jorge E. Santos, Gary T. Horowitz, Donald Marolf
1 citations
Journal of High Energy Physics
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
1.87
article

Constraints are not enough

Jorge E. Santos, Gary T. Horowitz, Donald Marolf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A bstract The Euclidean Einstein-Hilbert action is well-known to be unbounded below and thus to raise many questions regarding the definition of the gravitational path integral. A variety of works since the late 1980’s have suggested that this problem disappears when one fixes a foliation of the spacetime and imposes the corresponding gravitational constraints. However, we show here that this approach fails with various classes of boundary conditions imposed on the foliation: compact slices without boundary, asymptotically flat, or asymptotically locally anti-de Sitter slices. We also discuss the idea of fixing the scalar curvature and Wick-rotating the conformal factor, and show that it also fails to produce an action bounded from below.

Journal of High Energy PhysicsVol. 2025(10)
University of Cambridge (GB), University of California System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.