Assessment of Pharmaceutical Protein–Ligand Pose and Affinity Predictions in <scp>CASP16</scp>

The protein-ligand component of the 16th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP16) challenged participants to predict both binding poses and affinities of small molecules to protein targets, with a focus on drug-like compounds from pharmaceutical discovery projects. Thirty research groups submitted predictions for 229 protein-ligand pose targets and 140 affinity targets across five protein systems. Among the submitted predictions, template-based pose-prediction methods did particularly well, with the best groups achieving mean LDDT-PLI values of 0.69 (scale of 0-1 with 1 best). For comparison, we also ran a set of automated baseline pose-prediction methods, including ones using deep neural networks. Of these, AlphaFold 3 did particularly well, with a mean LDDT-PLI of 0.8, thus outscoring the best CASP16 predictor. The CASP affinity predictions showed modest correlation with experimental data (maximum Kendall's τ = 0.42), well below the theoretical maximum possible given experimental uncertainty (~0.73). As seen in prior challenges, providing experimental structures did not improve affinity predictions in the second stage of the challenge, suggesting that the scoring functions used here are a key limiting factor. Overall, the accuracy achieved by CASP participants is similar to that observed in the prior Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) blinded prediction challenges. The present results highlight the progress and persistent challenges in computational protein-ligand modeling and provide valuable benchmarks for the field of computer-aided drug design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70061
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Pharmaceutical Protein–Ligand Pose and Affinity Predictions in CASP16

Xavier Robin, Janani Durairaj, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Michael K. Gilson et al.
3 citations
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
4.51
article

Assessment of Pharmaceutical Protein–Ligand Pose and Affinity Predictions in CASP16

Xavier Robin, Janani Durairaj, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Michael K. Gilson, Jérôme Eberhardt, Peter Škrinjar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The protein-ligand component of the 16th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP16) challenged participants to predict both binding poses and affinities of small molecules to protein targets, with a focus on drug-like compounds from pharmaceutical discovery projects. Thirty research groups submitted predictions for 229 protein-ligand pose targets and 140 affinity targets across five protein systems. Among the submitted predictions, template-based pose-prediction methods did particularly well, with the best groups achieving mean LDDT-PLI values of 0.69 (scale of 0-1 with 1 best). For comparison, we also ran a set of automated baseline pose-prediction methods, including ones using deep neural networks. Of these, AlphaFold 3 did particularly well, with a mean LDDT-PLI of 0.8, thus outscoring the best CASP16 predictor. The CASP affinity predictions showed modest correlation with experimental data (maximum Kendall's τ = 0.42), well below the theoretical maximum possible given experimental uncertainty (~0.73). As seen in prior challenges, providing experimental structures did not improve affinity predictions in the second stage of the challenge, suggesting that the scoring functions used here are a key limiting factor. Overall, the accuracy achieved by CASP participants is similar to that observed in the prior Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) blinded prediction challenges. The present results highlight the progress and persistent challenges in computational protein-ligand modeling and provide valuable benchmarks for the field of computer-aided drug design.

Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsVol. 94(1)
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH), University of Basel (CH), University of California San Diego (US), University of Montana (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
4.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.