Combining fermentation and vermicomposting for sustainable pet food waste management: Effects of waste profile and inoculum source

Ingredient production is the main driver of pet-food GHGs and land use. Indeed, the pet food industry uses nearly 495,000 km<sup>2</sup> of land annually. Yet, waste streams from production and declassified products remain underexplored as resources to produce high quality soil amendment. This study proposes an integrated approach to valorise such organic wastes through microbial fermentation prior to vermicomposting. Two experiments were conducted. (1) the effects of kibble incorporation ratio (15 % vs. 30 %), fibre source (spruce flakes, SF vs. beech sawdust, BS), and container size (50 L vs. 500 L) on fermentation dynamics, worm preference, and vermicompost properties were assessed. (2) the functional equivalence of commercial inoculum (EM®) and locally sourced indigenous microorganisms (IMO) was evaluated. Results showed that fibre type significantly influenced fermentation outcomes at low kibble incorporation, with BS lowering pH (from 9 in SF30% to 5.2 in BS15%, P < 0.001) and increasing redox potential (+213 %, P < 0.001). Electroconductivity was strongly affected by both kibble ratio (+110 %, P < 0.001) and fibre source (+130 %, P < 0.001). Worms displayed strong preference for BS-based substrates (+493 % density in 7 days, P < 0.001). Vermicompost derived from SF exhibited slower nitrogen and carbon mineralisation than BS. Container size had no effect on fermentation. EM® and IMO performed equivalently in fermentation efficiency, worm attraction, and functional microbial activity (metagenomic/metaproteomic analyses). This work demonstrates that combining microbial pre-digestion with vermicomposting can upcycle pet food waste into valuable soil amendments, while supporting local circular bioeconomy and sustainable waste management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2025.115176
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining fermentation and vermicomposting for sustainable pet food waste management: Effects of waste profile and inoculum source

Gilbert Skorski, Isabelle Metton, Sercan Beytür, Romain Tuffou et al.
1 citations
Waste Management
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
1.19
article

Combining fermentation and vermicomposting for sustainable pet food waste management: Effects of waste profile and inoculum source

Gilbert Skorski, Isabelle Metton, Sercan Beytür, Romain Tuffou, Anna Surribas, Alexandre Feugier, Sébastien Delmotte, Hélène Blanquart, Xavier Salducci, Laurent Windal, Sebastien N Voisin, Marion Leborgne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ingredient production is the main driver of pet-food GHGs and land use. Indeed, the pet food industry uses nearly 495,000 km<sup>2</sup> of land annually. Yet, waste streams from production and declassified products remain underexplored as resources to produce high quality soil amendment. This study proposes an integrated approach to valorise such organic wastes through microbial fermentation prior to vermicomposting. Two experiments were conducted. (1) the effects of kibble incorporation ratio (15 % vs. 30 %), fibre source (spruce flakes, SF vs. beech sawdust, BS), and container size (50 L vs. 500 L) on fermentation dynamics, worm preference, and vermicompost properties were assessed. (2) the functional equivalence of commercial inoculum (EM®) and locally sourced indigenous microorganisms (IMO) was evaluated. Results showed that fibre type significantly influenced fermentation outcomes at low kibble incorporation, with BS lowering pH (from 9 in SF30% to 5.2 in BS15%, P < 0.001) and increasing redox potential (+213 %, P < 0.001). Electroconductivity was strongly affected by both kibble ratio (+110 %, P < 0.001) and fibre source (+130 %, P < 0.001). Worms displayed strong preference for BS-based substrates (+493 % density in 7 days, P < 0.001). Vermicompost derived from SF exhibited slower nitrogen and carbon mineralisation than BS. Container size had no effect on fermentation. EM® and IMO performed equivalently in fermentation efficiency, worm attraction, and functional microbial activity (metagenomic/metaproteomic analyses). This work demonstrates that combining microbial pre-digestion with vermicomposting can upcycle pet food waste into valuable soil amendments, while supporting local circular bioeconomy and sustainable waste management.

Waste ManagementVol. 208
Royal Navy (GB), Institute of Natural Sciences (BE), Maternité Port Royal (FR), Genoscope (FR), Phylogeny (United States) (US), Institut de Mécanique Céleste et de Calcul des Éphémérides (FR), ENVIRON (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.