Bloch strikes back: a reassessment of the intensity-duration reciprocity.

Perceiving a brief visual stimulus depends on both its intensity and its exposure duration.These two parameters are in a reciprocal relationship, such that doubling the duration andhalving the intensity of a stimulus leads to equivalent perceptual performance. Thisrelationship is known as Bloch’s law. Despite numerous demonstrations of the validity ofBloch’s law, recent evidence shows violations for exposures ranging from few microsecondsto tens of milliseconds. The main goal of this work was to reassess the law’s validity on theperception of simple geometric shapes. The latter were presented for durations between0.15 and 100 ms thanks to a modern LCD-based tachistoscope. We successfully replicatedthe reciprocal relationship between intensity and duration across five different tasksinvolving detection, shape discrimination and subjective visibility judgements. In accordancewith past literature, we report reciprocity only for stimuli shorter than a maximum criticalduration (between 15 and 36 ms, depending on the task). We discuss these results incomparison with the aforementioned violations of Bloch’s law, and identify potential causesof the latter. This work also served as a proof-of-principle that our apparatus is suitable forthe study of the intensity-duration reciprocity with a diverse range of stimuli.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b5yuv_v1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bloch strikes back: a reassessment of the intensity-duration reciprocity.

Axel Cleeremans, Pietro Amerio
1 citations
Neural dynamics and brain function
1.43
article

Bloch strikes back: a reassessment of the intensity-duration reciprocity.

Axel Cleeremans, Pietro Amerio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Perceiving a brief visual stimulus depends on both its intensity and its exposure duration.These two parameters are in a reciprocal relationship, such that doubling the duration andhalving the intensity of a stimulus leads to equivalent perceptual performance. Thisrelationship is known as Bloch’s law. Despite numerous demonstrations of the validity ofBloch’s law, recent evidence shows violations for exposures ranging from few microsecondsto tens of milliseconds. The main goal of this work was to reassess the law’s validity on theperception of simple geometric shapes. The latter were presented for durations between0.15 and 100 ms thanks to a modern LCD-based tachistoscope. We successfully replicatedthe reciprocal relationship between intensity and duration across five different tasksinvolving detection, shape discrimination and subjective visibility judgements. In accordancewith past literature, we report reciprocity only for stimuli shorter than a maximum criticalduration (between 15 and 36 ms, depending on the task). We discuss these results incomparison with the aforementioned violations of Bloch’s law, and identify potential causesof the latter. This work also served as a proof-of-principle that our apparatus is suitable forthe study of the intensity-duration reciprocity with a diverse range of stimuli.

Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Neural dynamics and brain function
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.