Promoting arm movement practice with a novel wheelchair armrest early after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Chronic upper extremity (UE) impairment is common after stroke. This study aimed to evaluate both the feasibility and preliminary clinical effects of Boost, a novel wheelchair-mounted rehabilitation device designed to assist individuals in UE motor recovery during inpatient rehabilitation. Method Thirty-five stroke inpatients were randomized to perform additional UE exercises alongside standard therapy, using either Boost or a therapist-customized booklet for self-practice. Feasibility outcomes included the volume of self-directed practice completed and participants’ ability to integrate Boost sessions into routine inpatient care. Clinical outcomes included the UE Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) Exam, Box and Block Test, Motor Activity Log, Modified Ashworth Scale, shoulder subluxation, and shoulder pain. Results At baseline, mean days post-stroke were 11.9 ± 4.6 (SD) and 13.1 ± 5.9, and UEFM scores were 20.5 ± 10.1 and 21.0 ± 13.5 for the intervention and control groups, respectively. Intervention durations averaged 11.9 ± 4.0 and 17.2 ± 8.8 days, respectively. Participants in the Boost group completed 3,359 ± 3,137 (median: 5,698, Q1 = 913, Q3 = 6,611) arm movements. No significant between-group clinical differences were found at the three-month follow-up. However, the Boost group showed a trend toward greater UEFM improvement immediately post-intervention (11.8 vs. 6.9 points, p = 0.06). Importantly, UEFM gains were predicted by the number of Boost exercises performed ( p = 0.02, R²=0.34). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with less severe impairment (baseline UEFM > 21) achieved significantly greater UEFM improvements at discharge with Boost compared to controls (15.8 vs. 7.8 points, p = 0.01). Conclusions Boost use was feasible and enabled participants to complete thousands of UE movements during routine inpatient rehabilitation without direct supervision. While this added practice did not lead to significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes, preliminary findings suggest potential short-term benefits—particularly for individuals with less severe impairment—that warrant evaluation in larger, adequately powered trials. Trial registration : This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the title “Comparing Different Rehabilitation Exercise Strategies for Improving Arm Recovery After Stroke (Boost)” in May 2023; registration number: NCT05880940.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-02111-6
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting arm movement practice with a novel wheelchair armrest early after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

David J. Reinkensmeyer, Charles Y. Liu, Niko H. Fullmer, Daniel K. Zondervan et al.
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Promoting arm movement practice with a novel wheelchair armrest early after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

David J. Reinkensmeyer, Charles Y. Liu, Niko H. Fullmer, Daniel K. Zondervan, Emily Rose Rosario, M. Comellas, Sangjoon Jonathan Kim, Christine Kim, An H. Do, Vicky Chan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Chronic upper extremity (UE) impairment is common after stroke. This study aimed to evaluate both the feasibility and preliminary clinical effects of Boost, a novel wheelchair-mounted rehabilitation device designed to assist individuals in UE motor recovery during inpatient rehabilitation. Method Thirty-five stroke inpatients were randomized to perform additional UE exercises alongside standard therapy, using either Boost or a therapist-customized booklet for self-practice. Feasibility outcomes included the volume of self-directed practice completed and participants’ ability to integrate Boost sessions into routine inpatient care. Clinical outcomes included the UE Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) Exam, Box and Block Test, Motor Activity Log, Modified Ashworth Scale, shoulder subluxation, and shoulder pain. Results At baseline, mean days post-stroke were 11.9 ± 4.6 (SD) and 13.1 ± 5.9, and UEFM scores were 20.5 ± 10.1 and 21.0 ± 13.5 for the intervention and control groups, respectively. Intervention durations averaged 11.9 ± 4.0 and 17.2 ± 8.8 days, respectively. Participants in the Boost group completed 3,359 ± 3,137 (median: 5,698, Q1 = 913, Q3 = 6,611) arm movements. No significant between-group clinical differences were found at the three-month follow-up. However, the Boost group showed a trend toward greater UEFM improvement immediately post-intervention (11.8 vs. 6.9 points, p = 0.06). Importantly, UEFM gains were predicted by the number of Boost exercises performed ( p = 0.02, R²=0.34). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with less severe impairment (baseline UEFM > 21) achieved significantly greater UEFM improvements at discharge with Boost compared to controls (15.8 vs. 7.8 points, p = 0.01). Conclusions Boost use was feasible and enabled participants to complete thousands of UE movements during routine inpatient rehabilitation without direct supervision. While this added practice did not lead to significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes, preliminary findings suggest potential short-term benefits—particularly for individuals with less severe impairment—that warrant evaluation in larger, adequately powered trials. Trial registration : This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the title “Comparing Different Rehabilitation Exercise Strategies for Improving Arm Recovery After Stroke (Boost)” in May 2023; registration number: NCT05880940.

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
University of Southern California (US), LAC+USC Medical Center (US), Universitat de Lleida (ES), University of California, Irvine (US), Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center (US), Flint Rehabilitation Devices (United States) (US), Casa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation (US), UC Irvine Health (US), Rancho Research Institute (US), Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.