Top advances of the year: Noninvasive colorectal cancer screening tests

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to be more effective in preventing deaths from this common cancer, but current methods are suboptimal. Because of limitations and barriers, interval cancers occur, and many people (25%-40%) are not compliant with colorectal cancer screening. Advances over the past year, which have led to a blood-based screening test and more accurate stool tests, address the limitations of current tests. Three clinical trials published in the past year have led to a novel blood-based test, a multitarget stool eRNA test, and an improved multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening. The multitarget eRNA stool-based test and multitarget stool DNA test are 94.4% sensitive (87.9% specificity) and 93.5% sensitive (90.6% specificity) for CRC and 45.9% sensitive and 43.4% sensitive for advanced polyps, respectively. The blood test uses cell free DNA to detect CRC and is 83% sensitive for CRC (89.6% specificity) and 13% sensitive for advanced adenomas. These advances provide a novel effective blood-based test for CRC screening, which promises to increase compliance, and more accurate stool-based tests, which promise to lead to fewer interval CRCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70115
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Top advances of the year: Noninvasive colorectal cancer screening tests

Pakdee Rojanasopondist, William M. Grady, Brian Ko
2 citations
Cancer
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
2.09
article

Top advances of the year: Noninvasive colorectal cancer screening tests

Pakdee Rojanasopondist, William M. Grady, Brian Ko
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been shown to be more effective in preventing deaths from this common cancer, but current methods are suboptimal. Because of limitations and barriers, interval cancers occur, and many people (25%-40%) are not compliant with colorectal cancer screening. Advances over the past year, which have led to a blood-based screening test and more accurate stool tests, address the limitations of current tests. Three clinical trials published in the past year have led to a novel blood-based test, a multitarget stool eRNA test, and an improved multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening. The multitarget eRNA stool-based test and multitarget stool DNA test are 94.4% sensitive (87.9% specificity) and 93.5% sensitive (90.6% specificity) for CRC and 45.9% sensitive and 43.4% sensitive for advanced polyps, respectively. The blood test uses cell free DNA to detect CRC and is 83% sensitive for CRC (89.6% specificity) and 13% sensitive for advanced adenomas. These advances provide a novel effective blood-based test for CRC screening, which promises to increase compliance, and more accurate stool-based tests, which promise to lead to fewer interval CRCs.

CancerVol. 131(20)
University of Washington (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.