Magnetic Properties of Martian Impact Basins Including the Effect of Mantle Excavation

Abstract The weak magnetism of many impact basins on Mars has historically been interpreted as evidence of the martian dynamo's cessation before ∼4.0 Ga. However, expected magnetic properties of these impact basins are poorly known because basin formation exhumes and recrystallizes mantle material, which has not been sampled by martian meteorites. Potential depletion of magnetic minerals in these mantle‐derived rocks, as observed when comparing terrestrial mantle xenoliths to typical crustal material, may lead to weak magnetization even in the presence of a strong, stable dynamo. A reversing or intermittently active dynamo may also permit higher magnetic mineral concentrations while remaining consistent with the weak detected magnetic field signal. To explore the relationship between ancient martian dynamo behavior and orbitally observed magnetic fields, we quantify the expected magnetic properties of large impact basins by modeling the crystallization of candidate impact melt compositions. Our results suggest maximum impact basin magnetization intensities in the 0.5–4 A/m range assuming a non‐reversing dynamo. Although these values are low compared to the 1–20 A/m range expected for unperturbed martian crust, they would still yield stronger magnetic fields than those observed above the large martian impact basins Hellas, Utopia, Isidis, and Argyre. This ultimately suggests that a reversing or intermittent dynamo may be necessary to explain the weak magnetism of these martian impact basins. A martian dynamo which persisted until 3.9 to 3.7 Ga and reversed at rates >5 Myr −1 remains the most straightforward explanation for all available orbital magnetic observations and paleomagnetic measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025je009173
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetic Properties of Martian Impact Basins Including the Effect of Mantle Excavation

James M.D. Day, Sarah Steele, R. R. Fu
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Magnetic Properties of Martian Impact Basins Including the Effect of Mantle Excavation

James M.D. Day, Sarah Steele, R. R. Fu
article en

Abstract

Abstract The weak magnetism of many impact basins on Mars has historically been interpreted as evidence of the martian dynamo's cessation before ∼4.0 Ga. However, expected magnetic properties of these impact basins are poorly known because basin formation exhumes and recrystallizes mantle material, which has not been sampled by martian meteorites. Potential depletion of magnetic minerals in these mantle‐derived rocks, as observed when comparing terrestrial mantle xenoliths to typical crustal material, may lead to weak magnetization even in the presence of a strong, stable dynamo. A reversing or intermittently active dynamo may also permit higher magnetic mineral concentrations while remaining consistent with the weak detected magnetic field signal. To explore the relationship between ancient martian dynamo behavior and orbitally observed magnetic fields, we quantify the expected magnetic properties of large impact basins by modeling the crystallization of candidate impact melt compositions. Our results suggest maximum impact basin magnetization intensities in the 0.5–4 A/m range assuming a non‐reversing dynamo. Although these values are low compared to the 1–20 A/m range expected for unperturbed martian crust, they would still yield stronger magnetic fields than those observed above the large martian impact basins Hellas, Utopia, Isidis, and Argyre. This ultimately suggests that a reversing or intermittent dynamo may be necessary to explain the weak magnetism of these martian impact basins. A martian dynamo which persisted until 3.9 to 3.7 Ga and reversed at rates >5 Myr −1 remains the most straightforward explanation for all available orbital magnetic observations and paleomagnetic measurements.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 130(10)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), Harvard University Press (US), University of California San Diego (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.