JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE AND APPLICATION OF A MODEL FOR EVALUATING PROJECT ACTIVITIES IN UNIVERSITIES

The role of project activities in higher education institutions is increasing every year, given the increasing coverage of projects in many areas of educational and industrial activities. In this regard, there is a need for methods for evaluating project activities and managing their processes. It is proposed to use project management maturity models as similar techniques. A study of the most popular project management maturity models has shown that they have certain advantages and disadvantages. The result of the study also led to the conclusion that it is necessary to carry out a certain adaptation of these models to educational organizations due to the specifics of their activities. The main feature is the wide variety of project types in educational organizations, which leads to difficulties in unifying project accounting and project management bodies. The Kerzner model was chosen for adaptation. The main difference between the adapted Kerzner model is the rejection of unified accounting and greater attention to specialized indicators that make it possible to evaluate the management of project activities in universities, taking into account the specifics of their activities. As an example, the authors assessed the maturity of project management of a particular university, which is a typical representative of state universities located in the regions of Russia, namely Pskov State University. The use of the Kerzner model for evaluation revealed that this university does not pay enough attention to the development of professional development plans for personnel involved in the university's project activities, and there are no procedures for accumulating and applying the most proven project management practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Review Theory and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35679/2226-0226-2025-15-7-905-913
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE AND APPLICATION OF A MODEL FOR EVALUATING PROJECT ACTIVITIES IN UNIVERSITIES

Victoria Valentinovna Notchenko, Yuri Nikolaevich Dyatlov, Dmitry Yuryevich Kabanov
Scientific Review Theory and Practice
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE AND APPLICATION OF A MODEL FOR EVALUATING PROJECT ACTIVITIES IN UNIVERSITIES

Victoria Valentinovna Notchenko, Yuri Nikolaevich Dyatlov, Dmitry Yuryevich Kabanov
article en

Abstract

The role of project activities in higher education institutions is increasing every year, given the increasing coverage of projects in many areas of educational and industrial activities. In this regard, there is a need for methods for evaluating project activities and managing their processes. It is proposed to use project management maturity models as similar techniques. A study of the most popular project management maturity models has shown that they have certain advantages and disadvantages. The result of the study also led to the conclusion that it is necessary to carry out a certain adaptation of these models to educational organizations due to the specifics of their activities. The main feature is the wide variety of project types in educational organizations, which leads to difficulties in unifying project accounting and project management bodies. The Kerzner model was chosen for adaptation. The main difference between the adapted Kerzner model is the rejection of unified accounting and greater attention to specialized indicators that make it possible to evaluate the management of project activities in universities, taking into account the specifics of their activities. As an example, the authors assessed the maturity of project management of a particular university, which is a typical representative of state universities located in the regions of Russia, namely Pskov State University. The use of the Kerzner model for evaluation revealed that this university does not pay enough attention to the development of professional development plans for personnel involved in the university's project activities, and there are no procedures for accumulating and applying the most proven project management practices.

Scientific Review Theory and PracticeVol. 15(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE AND APPLICATION OF A MODEL FOR EVALUATING PROJECT ACTIVITIES IN UNIVERSITIES — Victoria Valentinovna Notchenko, Yuri Nikolaevich Dyatlov, et al. · Scientific Review Theory and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS