The medical termination of pregnancy act: Examining access and restrictions

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021 is a significant change in the Indian law framework about abortion. For particular kinds of women, the Amendment increases access to abortion services by extending the permitted length of pregnancy termination from 20 to 24 weeks, therefore addressing medical risks or fetal defects. It also provides guidelines for teenagers and survivors of sexual assault, therefore granting them the right to get, under specific circumstances, safe and legal abortion services. These clauses show how India's abortion access has improved to protect women's reproductive rights. Therefore, even if the Amendment fixes some shortcomings in the original Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, it also creates problems that hinder the whole actualization of women's rights. The Amendment requires approval of any abortion beyond twenty weeks by a doctor or a medical board. This continues to be a challenge for women, particularly those dealing with later-stage gestation unwanted pregnancies. Medical boards' involvement, mandated in particular cases, increases questions about accessibility. One major issue is whether these bodies will operate at the district level or call for state-level referrals. Women in rural or isolated areas, where the infrastructure of healthcare is already inadequate, could find it difficult to get timely abortion services. Moreover, the continuous reliance on medical boards instead of allowing women to make decisions regarding their reproductive health shapes abortion as a privilege rather than a right. This highlights the class difference even further since urban women usually have easier access to necessary medical consultations and approvals while rural women face logistical and financial challenges. Therefore, even if the Amendment offers some improvements, it keeps structural inequalities alive and does not guarantee universally accessible, safe, and fair reproductive healthcare for every woman living in India.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025ss0302
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The medical termination of pregnancy act: Examining access and restrictions

Prafulla Kumar Sharma
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

The medical termination of pregnancy act: Examining access and restrictions

Prafulla Kumar Sharma
article en

Abstract

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021 is a significant change in the Indian law framework about abortion. For particular kinds of women, the Amendment increases access to abortion services by extending the permitted length of pregnancy termination from 20 to 24 weeks, therefore addressing medical risks or fetal defects. It also provides guidelines for teenagers and survivors of sexual assault, therefore granting them the right to get, under specific circumstances, safe and legal abortion services. These clauses show how India's abortion access has improved to protect women's reproductive rights. Therefore, even if the Amendment fixes some shortcomings in the original Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, it also creates problems that hinder the whole actualization of women's rights. The Amendment requires approval of any abortion beyond twenty weeks by a doctor or a medical board. This continues to be a challenge for women, particularly those dealing with later-stage gestation unwanted pregnancies. Medical boards' involvement, mandated in particular cases, increases questions about accessibility. One major issue is whether these bodies will operate at the district level or call for state-level referrals. Women in rural or isolated areas, where the infrastructure of healthcare is already inadequate, could find it difficult to get timely abortion services. Moreover, the continuous reliance on medical boards instead of allowing women to make decisions regarding their reproductive health shapes abortion as a privilege rather than a right. This highlights the class difference even further since urban women usually have easier access to necessary medical consultations and approvals while rural women face logistical and financial challenges. Therefore, even if the Amendment offers some improvements, it keeps structural inequalities alive and does not guarantee universally accessible, safe, and fair reproductive healthcare for every woman living in India.

Multidisciplinary Science JournalVol. 7
Amity University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.