Analyzing the relationship between social media usage and participation in social movements

Social media has increasingly been recognized as a powerful instrument for mobilizing and engaging individuals in contemporary social movements. This study was conducted to examine the relationship between social media usage and participation in societal movements. Within this context, the role of social media in mobilization has been observed to grow in significance. The variables related to social movements included Political Ideological Alignment (PIA), Perceived Impact of Social Media (PISM), Frequency of Social Media Use (FSM), Engagement with Content (EC), and Type of Social Media Platforms (TSMP). Data were collected through surveys administered to 512 participants, among whom 243 were identified as active social media users engaged in social movements. The survey contained items addressing participants’ social media usage, political orientations, and levels of involvement in various movements, with responses measured using Likert scales. The aim was to evaluate the extent of interaction with different platforms, perceived effectiveness of social media in activism, and the influence of ideological stance on levels of engagement. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 28. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize trends in social media usage and movement participation, providing insights into patterns of engagement based on usage frequency, platform preference, and political alignment. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to explore the linear relationship between continuous variables, particularly the association between frequency of social media use and engagement in social movements. Additionally, ANOVA was applied to identify differences in participation across categories defined by platform type and ideological alignment. The findings demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between social media use and participation in social movements. It was found that frequent usage, platform selection, and political alignment significantly influenced the extent of activism. Social media platforms were shown to effectively facilitate user mobilization, foster engagement, and amplify collective actions. These results underscore the critical role played by digital platforms in modern activism and offer strategic implications for the planning and execution of future digital mobilization and advocacy campaigns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025ss0316
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the relationship between social media usage and participation in social movements

Bhavya, Ashmeet Kaur, Rahul Amin, Sharieff et al.
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Social Media and Politics
article

Analyzing the relationship between social media usage and participation in social movements

Bhavya, Ashmeet Kaur, Rahul Amin, Sharieff, Mohammad Mohnish, Anoop Dev
article en

Abstract

Social media has increasingly been recognized as a powerful instrument for mobilizing and engaging individuals in contemporary social movements. This study was conducted to examine the relationship between social media usage and participation in societal movements. Within this context, the role of social media in mobilization has been observed to grow in significance. The variables related to social movements included Political Ideological Alignment (PIA), Perceived Impact of Social Media (PISM), Frequency of Social Media Use (FSM), Engagement with Content (EC), and Type of Social Media Platforms (TSMP). Data were collected through surveys administered to 512 participants, among whom 243 were identified as active social media users engaged in social movements. The survey contained items addressing participants’ social media usage, political orientations, and levels of involvement in various movements, with responses measured using Likert scales. The aim was to evaluate the extent of interaction with different platforms, perceived effectiveness of social media in activism, and the influence of ideological stance on levels of engagement. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 28. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize trends in social media usage and movement participation, providing insights into patterns of engagement based on usage frequency, platform preference, and political alignment. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to explore the linear relationship between continuous variables, particularly the association between frequency of social media use and engagement in social movements. Additionally, ANOVA was applied to identify differences in participation across categories defined by platform type and ideological alignment. The findings demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between social media use and participation in social movements. It was found that frequent usage, platform selection, and political alignment significantly influenced the extent of activism. Social media platforms were shown to effectively facilitate user mobilization, foster engagement, and amplify collective actions. These results underscore the critical role played by digital platforms in modern activism and offer strategic implications for the planning and execution of future digital mobilization and advocacy campaigns.

Multidisciplinary Science JournalVol. 7
Jain University (IN), National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur (IN), Noida International University (IN), Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Chitkara University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.