Indirect Estimation of the Tensile Strength of Plastic-Infused Concrete using Gradient Boosting

This paper applies gradient boosting (GB), a machine learning (ML) methodology for modeling the tensile strength (TS) of concrete made with waste plastic. Firstly, for development of GB models, the database including 235 data records was obtained from the existing studies. Following that, several GB models were developed by using the combination of different hyperparameters and their performance was validated through several statistical metrics. The optimum model achieved R² values of 0.9 and 0.89 for the training and testing datasets, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) was noted as 0.29 MPa for training and only marginally higher at 0.32 MPa in testing meanwhile mean absolute error (MAE) was found 0.25 MPa in training and 0.27 MPa in testing. These results demonstrate the capability of GB modeling in predicting TS of concrete.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fusion Journal of Engineering and Sciences
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64615/fjes.1.specialissue.2025.31
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indirect Estimation of the Tensile Strength of Plastic-Infused Concrete using Gradient Boosting

Muhammad Atayyab Shahid, Usama Asif
Fusion Journal of Engineering and Sciences
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Indirect Estimation of the Tensile Strength of Plastic-Infused Concrete using Gradient Boosting

Muhammad Atayyab Shahid, Usama Asif
article en

Abstract

This paper applies gradient boosting (GB), a machine learning (ML) methodology for modeling the tensile strength (TS) of concrete made with waste plastic. Firstly, for development of GB models, the database including 235 data records was obtained from the existing studies. Following that, several GB models were developed by using the combination of different hyperparameters and their performance was validated through several statistical metrics. The optimum model achieved R² values of 0.9 and 0.89 for the training and testing datasets, respectively. The root mean square error (RMSE) was noted as 0.29 MPa for training and only marginally higher at 0.32 MPa in testing meanwhile mean absolute error (MAE) was found 0.25 MPa in training and 0.27 MPa in testing. These results demonstrate the capability of GB modeling in predicting TS of concrete.

Fusion Journal of Engineering and Sciences
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), Abbottabad University of Science and Technology (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.