Transcriptomic Profiling of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Reveals Prognostic Markers in mCRPC Patients Treated with LuPSMA Therapy

<b>Rationale:</b> The mode of action of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) therapy is not fully understood and a relevant fraction of patients show treatment failure. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of immune suppression in the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) of LuPSMA therapy patients. <b>Methods:</b> Tumor tissue samples from 61 patients, who were referred for LuPSMA from March 2018 until March 2022, were retrieved. Among these, 40 patients fulfilled all criteria and were therefore included in the analysis. Of these, 3 patients had two biopsies; prior and under systemic treatment, which is why we analyzed 43 samples: 29 (67%) with treatment-naïve tissues samples (cohort 1) and 14 (33%) during systemic treatment. Patients were followed up to assess overall survival. We examined gene expression and immune cell counts (derived from gene expression data) in the two sub-cohorts through transcriptome profiling with the Decipher prostate assay (Veracyte, San Diego, CA), a subset of these patients has been described previously. <b>Results:</b> In the total cohort, the ratio of activated (M1)/naive (M0) macrophages (HR = 0.90 [0.84-0.98]; p = 0.009) was a significant prognosticator of OS. In cohort 1, PD-L2 expression (HR = 1.07 [1.02 - 1.11]; p = 0.003)) and the M1/M0 ratio signature (HR = 0.89 [0.81-0.99]; p = 0.026) were significant independent prognostic factors of OS when analyzed together in a multivariate analysis. AR gene expression was significantly elevated in cohort 2 compared to 1 (p < 0.001). Several DNA repair signatures analyzed were significantly higher in cohort 2 than in cohort 1 (p < 0.05). In cohort 2, PD-L2 expression (HR = 0.87 [0.77 - 0.98]; p = 0.017) emerged as an independent prognostic factor associated with improved OS when included in a multivariate model with the immune 190 score, a negative prognosticator in this analysis (HR = 1.25 [1.02 - 1.53]; p = 0.028). <b>Conclusions:</b> The ratio of M1/M0 macrophages was associated with favorable outcome of LuPSMA in the total cohort of patients. In treatment-naive patient samples, <i>PD-L2</i> expression was associated with unfavorable, whereas M1/M0 macrophages with favorable outcomes, which might indicate that immune checkpoint inhibition could be a combination partner of LuPSMA therapy. In patient biopsy samples acquired after the start of systemic treatment, AR gene expression and DNA repair signatures appear to be significantly altered and <i>PD-L2</i> became a protective marker.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theranostics
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.113614
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transcriptomic Profiling of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Reveals Prognostic Markers in mCRPC Patients Treated with LuPSMA Therapy

Elai Davicioni, Robert Seifert, Leonor Lopes, Ken Herrmann et al.
1 citations
Theranostics
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
0.80
article

Transcriptomic Profiling of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Reveals Prognostic Markers in mCRPC Patients Treated with LuPSMA Therapy

Elai Davicioni, Robert Seifert, Leonor Lopes, Ken Herrmann, Christopher Darr, Claudia Kesch, Boris Hadaschik, Tuğçe Telli, Kuangyu Shi, Analena Handke, Wolfgang P Fendler, Katharina Lückerath
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> The mode of action of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) therapy is not fully understood and a relevant fraction of patients show treatment failure. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of immune suppression in the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) of LuPSMA therapy patients. <b>Methods:</b> Tumor tissue samples from 61 patients, who were referred for LuPSMA from March 2018 until March 2022, were retrieved. Among these, 40 patients fulfilled all criteria and were therefore included in the analysis. Of these, 3 patients had two biopsies; prior and under systemic treatment, which is why we analyzed 43 samples: 29 (67%) with treatment-naïve tissues samples (cohort 1) and 14 (33%) during systemic treatment. Patients were followed up to assess overall survival. We examined gene expression and immune cell counts (derived from gene expression data) in the two sub-cohorts through transcriptome profiling with the Decipher prostate assay (Veracyte, San Diego, CA), a subset of these patients has been described previously. <b>Results:</b> In the total cohort, the ratio of activated (M1)/naive (M0) macrophages (HR = 0.90 [0.84-0.98]; p = 0.009) was a significant prognosticator of OS. In cohort 1, PD-L2 expression (HR = 1.07 [1.02 - 1.11]; p = 0.003)) and the M1/M0 ratio signature (HR = 0.89 [0.81-0.99]; p = 0.026) were significant independent prognostic factors of OS when analyzed together in a multivariate analysis. AR gene expression was significantly elevated in cohort 2 compared to 1 (p < 0.001). Several DNA repair signatures analyzed were significantly higher in cohort 2 than in cohort 1 (p < 0.05). In cohort 2, PD-L2 expression (HR = 0.87 [0.77 - 0.98]; p = 0.017) emerged as an independent prognostic factor associated with improved OS when included in a multivariate model with the immune 190 score, a negative prognosticator in this analysis (HR = 1.25 [1.02 - 1.53]; p = 0.028). <b>Conclusions:</b> The ratio of M1/M0 macrophages was associated with favorable outcome of LuPSMA in the total cohort of patients. In treatment-naive patient samples, <i>PD-L2</i> expression was associated with unfavorable, whereas M1/M0 macrophages with favorable outcomes, which might indicate that immune checkpoint inhibition could be a combination partner of LuPSMA therapy. In patient biopsy samples acquired after the start of systemic treatment, AR gene expression and DNA repair signatures appear to be significantly altered and <i>PD-L2</i> became a protective marker.

TheranosticsVol. 15(18)
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne (DE), Veracyte (United States) (US), West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Prostate Cancer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.