KiDS-1000 cosmic shear reanalysis using MetaCalibration

A number of cosmic shear studies have reported results that are in mild tension with Planck cosmic microwave background measurements. To explore if this can be caused by biases in shear estimation, we revisit data analyses from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) using an alternative shape measurement pipeline that is more robust to uncertainties in the calibration. To this end, we present an implementation of =0.789_ and compare its performance to that of łensfit, which has been used in previous data analyses. We find that the multiplicative bias is reduced, in particular for the most distant redshifts, as derived from multi-band image simulations designed to match the KiDS data. For all tomographic bins, we obtain a multiplicative bias $|m|<0.017$, with negligible additive bias. Importantly, the calibration has a negligible sensitivity to key galaxy properties. The resulting robust shear estimates were used to obtain cosmological parameter constraints. We find that the parameter, S_8≡ σ_8 Ω_ /0.3 m -0.024 ^ +0.020 , is consistent with the previous KiDS-1000 łensfit constraint of S_8=0.776^ +0.029 +0.002 _ -0.027-0.003 (statistical and systematic errors). Thanks to the higher effective source density of the catalogue, the constraining power is improved by about 28%. The difference in S_8 with the Planck value remains at a similar level (1.8σ), implying that it is not caused by the shear measurements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557694
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

KiDS-1000 cosmic shear reanalysis using MetaCalibration

Shangrong Li, Catherine Heymans, Angus H. Wright, Mijin Yoon et al.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
article

KiDS-1000 cosmic shear reanalysis using MetaCalibration

Shangrong Li, Catherine Heymans, Angus H. Wright, Mijin Yoon, H. Hildebrandt, Henk Hoekstra, Konrad Kuijken, Robert Reischke, Jan Luca van den Busch, Marika Asgari, L. Miller, Benjamin Joachimi, Benjamin Stölzner
article en

Abstract

A number of cosmic shear studies have reported results that are in mild tension with Planck cosmic microwave background measurements. To explore if this can be caused by biases in shear estimation, we revisit data analyses from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) using an alternative shape measurement pipeline that is more robust to uncertainties in the calibration. To this end, we present an implementation of =0.789_ and compare its performance to that of łensfit, which has been used in previous data analyses. We find that the multiplicative bias is reduced, in particular for the most distant redshifts, as derived from multi-band image simulations designed to match the KiDS data. For all tomographic bins, we obtain a multiplicative bias $|m|<0.017$, with negligible additive bias. Importantly, the calibration has a negligible sensitivity to key galaxy properties. The resulting robust shear estimates were used to obtain cosmological parameter constraints. We find that the parameter, S_8≡ σ_8 Ω_ /0.3 m -0.024 ^ +0.020 , is consistent with the previous KiDS-1000 łensfit constraint of S_8=0.776^ +0.029 +0.002 _ -0.027-0.003 (statistical and systematic errors). Thanks to the higher effective source density of the catalogue, the constraining power is improved by about 28%. The difference in S_8 with the Planck value remains at a similar level (1.8σ), implying that it is not caused by the shear measurements.

Astronomy and Astrophysics
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, UK Research and Innovation, European Commission, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.