Problem-Solving Court Personnel Perspectives of Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

Incentives and sanctions, and more recently therapeutic adjustments, are used in problem-solving courts (PSCs) to promote behavioral change for participants. However, little is known about how PSC team members perceive the use of these strategies. Drawing upon 20 semi-structured interviews with drug court, mental health court, and veterans’ court personnel within a midwestern jurisdiction, we explored perceptions of incentives, sanctions, and therapeutic adjustments. Nearly all personnel reported a need to increase frequency and types of incentives offered. In addition, some PSC personnel described nonjudicial team members imposing informal consequences without the judge present. Furthermore, confusion was noted between the terms “sanction” and “therapeutic adjustment.” Understanding the distinction between sanctions and therapeutic adjustments is critical for PSC program evaluation, yet greater dissemination of existing guidelines is needed. Oversight by statewide administrative entities could help ensure consistent understanding and application of PSC best practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Justice Policy Review
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034251372849
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problem-Solving Court Personnel Perspectives of Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

Stacy Dewald, Laura Honegger
Criminal Justice Policy Review
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Problem-Solving Court Personnel Perspectives of Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

Stacy Dewald, Laura Honegger
article en

Abstract

Incentives and sanctions, and more recently therapeutic adjustments, are used in problem-solving courts (PSCs) to promote behavioral change for participants. However, little is known about how PSC team members perceive the use of these strategies. Drawing upon 20 semi-structured interviews with drug court, mental health court, and veterans’ court personnel within a midwestern jurisdiction, we explored perceptions of incentives, sanctions, and therapeutic adjustments. Nearly all personnel reported a need to increase frequency and types of incentives offered. In addition, some PSC personnel described nonjudicial team members imposing informal consequences without the judge present. Furthermore, confusion was noted between the terms “sanction” and “therapeutic adjustment.” Understanding the distinction between sanctions and therapeutic adjustments is critical for PSC program evaluation, yet greater dissemination of existing guidelines is needed. Oversight by statewide administrative entities could help ensure consistent understanding and application of PSC best practices.

Criminal Justice Policy ReviewVol. 37(1)
Arkansas State University (US), University of St. Francis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.