EFFECT OF CHLORHEXIDINE ON VARIOUS DENTAL IMPLANT SURFACES TYPES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ION RELEASE AND CORROSION IN AN IN VITRO SURGICAL MODEL

Background: Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash is one of the most commonly used antimicrobial solutions in dental practice. Nevertheless, this copolymer material on implant surface is susceptible to corrosion and ion release, which can result in the reduction of the lifetime of implant-supported restorations. Objective: The aim of this comparative in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine on the corrosion resistance and release of ions of various surface material associated dental implants with different clinical designs under simulated surgical conditions . Materials and Methods: Thirty dental implants in six groups were tested by material (Grade IV Titanium, Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V, and Zirconia) and design (Endosteal, Subperiosteal, and Mini implants). The samples were all soaked with 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine for 7 and 21 days in artificial saliva. The scale inhibition performance and corrosion resistance were observed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the ion concentration was analyzed through inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Results: Chlorhexidine exposure resulted in different degrees of corrosion and ionic release on different implant materials and designs. Ion release of Ti alloys was higher than that of Grade IV Ti and Zirconia. Mini implants showed higher levels of surface degradation with their larger surface-to-volume ratio. Conclusion: The interaction of chlorhexidine with dental implant surfaces varies according to the material and clinical design of the implants. These results highlight the importance to use CHX with caution in implant patients and to consider material- and design-specific responses to chemical exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58240/1829006x-2025.21.7-407
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECT OF CHLORHEXIDINE ON VARIOUS DENTAL IMPLANT SURFACES TYPES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ION RELEASE AND CORROSION IN AN IN VITRO SURGICAL MODEL

Haydar Salih, Abdulrahman Al-Najjar, Zaid Mustafa Akram
BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

EFFECT OF CHLORHEXIDINE ON VARIOUS DENTAL IMPLANT SURFACES TYPES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ION RELEASE AND CORROSION IN AN IN VITRO SURGICAL MODEL

Haydar Salih, Abdulrahman Al-Najjar, Zaid Mustafa Akram
article en

Abstract

Background: Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash is one of the most commonly used antimicrobial solutions in dental practice. Nevertheless, this copolymer material on implant surface is susceptible to corrosion and ion release, which can result in the reduction of the lifetime of implant-supported restorations. Objective: The aim of this comparative in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine on the corrosion resistance and release of ions of various surface material associated dental implants with different clinical designs under simulated surgical conditions . Materials and Methods: Thirty dental implants in six groups were tested by material (Grade IV Titanium, Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V, and Zirconia) and design (Endosteal, Subperiosteal, and Mini implants). The samples were all soaked with 0.2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine for 7 and 21 days in artificial saliva. The scale inhibition performance and corrosion resistance were observed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the ion concentration was analyzed through inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Results: Chlorhexidine exposure resulted in different degrees of corrosion and ionic release on different implant materials and designs. Ion release of Ti alloys was higher than that of Grade IV Ti and Zirconia. Mini implants showed higher levels of surface degradation with their larger surface-to-volume ratio. Conclusion: The interaction of chlorhexidine with dental implant surfaces varies according to the material and clinical design of the implants. These results highlight the importance to use CHX with caution in implant patients and to consider material- and design-specific responses to chemical exposure.

BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
University of Baghdad (IQ), Alrafidain University College (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EFFECT OF CHLORHEXIDINE ON VARIOUS DENTAL IMPLANT SURFACES TYPES: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ION RELEASE AND CORROSION IN AN IN VITRO SURGICAL MODEL — Haydar Salih, Abdulrahman Al-Najjar, et al. · BULLETIN OF STOMATOLOGY AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS