Enhancing Cyclist Safety in the EU: A Study on Lateral Overtaking Distance Across Seven Scenarios Using Lab and Crowdsourced Methods

Cyclists face significant risks from vehicles that overtake too closely.Through crowdsourcing (N = 200) and driving simulator (N = 20) experiments, this study examines driver behaviour in seven scenarios: laser projection, road sign, road marking, car projection, centre line and side line markings (baseline), cycle lane and no road markings.Crowdsourced participants consistently underestimated overtaking distances, particularly at wider gaps, despite feeling safer with greater distances.The simulation results showed that drivers maintained an average passing distance of 3.4 m when not constrained by traffic, exceeding the 1.5 m law of the European Union.However, interventions varied in effectiveness: while laser projection was preferred, it did not significantly increase passing distance.In contrast, a dedicated cycle lane and a solid centreline led to the greatest improvements.These findings highlight the discrepancies between perceived and actual safety and provide insight for policy interventions to enhance cyclist protection in the EU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3744333.3747813
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Cyclist Safety in the EU: A Study on Lateral Overtaking Distance Across Seven Scenarios Using Lab and Crowdsourced Methods

Pavlo Bazilinskyy, Gianluca Sapienza
1 citations
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.18
article

Enhancing Cyclist Safety in the EU: A Study on Lateral Overtaking Distance Across Seven Scenarios Using Lab and Crowdsourced Methods

Pavlo Bazilinskyy, Gianluca Sapienza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cyclists face significant risks from vehicles that overtake too closely.Through crowdsourcing (N = 200) and driving simulator (N = 20) experiments, this study examines driver behaviour in seven scenarios: laser projection, road sign, road marking, car projection, centre line and side line markings (baseline), cycle lane and no road markings.Crowdsourced participants consistently underestimated overtaking distances, particularly at wider gaps, despite feeling safer with greater distances.The simulation results showed that drivers maintained an average passing distance of 3.4 m when not constrained by traffic, exceeding the 1.5 m law of the European Union.However, interventions varied in effectiveness: while laser projection was preferred, it did not significantly increase passing distance.In contrast, a dedicated cycle lane and a solid centreline led to the greatest improvements.These findings highlight the discrepancies between perceived and actual safety and provide insight for policy interventions to enhance cyclist protection in the EU.

Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Cyclist Safety in the EU: A Study on Lateral Overtaking Distance Across Seven Scenarios Using Lab and Crowdsourced Methods — Pavlo Bazilinskyy, Gianluca Sapienza · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS