How helpful is it to organize personal information by activity?

Knowledge workers are known to adopt a range of different schemes to organise personal information resources such as email, documents, and spreadsheets. Some researchers have argued that grouping resources by the activity that they support should assist filing and retrieval. To investigate this claim, we systematically compared an activity-based scheme to two contrasting approaches: grouping by topic and grouping by time-management attributes. We also included an unconstrained free-form condition. We selected a controlled method to complement the existing naturalistic work on this topic. A cohort of 74 participants, with similar educational and occupational backgrounds, worked in small groups to design schemes for a given scenario with realistic and relatable goals, responsibilities, and interests. Each group was randomly assigned to one of the four conditions. A statistical analysis of their reported experiences showed that while they reported that all four schemes had some benefits, they had greater confidence in organizing by activity over the other constrained approaches. While organizing by activity was not preferred to an unconstrained approach, an exploratory review of these free-form designs showed that most participants spontaneously organised by activity at higher levels of a hierarchy with some use of other concepts, such as genre, at lower levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour and Information Technology
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2025.2560551
Primary Topic
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How helpful is it to organize personal information by activity?

Russell Beale, Paul Englefield
Behaviour and Information Technology
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
article

How helpful is it to organize personal information by activity?

Russell Beale, Paul Englefield
article en

Abstract

Knowledge workers are known to adopt a range of different schemes to organise personal information resources such as email, documents, and spreadsheets. Some researchers have argued that grouping resources by the activity that they support should assist filing and retrieval. To investigate this claim, we systematically compared an activity-based scheme to two contrasting approaches: grouping by topic and grouping by time-management attributes. We also included an unconstrained free-form condition. We selected a controlled method to complement the existing naturalistic work on this topic. A cohort of 74 participants, with similar educational and occupational backgrounds, worked in small groups to design schemes for a given scenario with realistic and relatable goals, responsibilities, and interests. Each group was randomly assigned to one of the four conditions. A statistical analysis of their reported experiences showed that while they reported that all four schemes had some benefits, they had greater confidence in organizing by activity over the other constrained approaches. While organizing by activity was not preferred to an unconstrained approach, an exploratory review of these free-form designs showed that most participants spontaneously organised by activity at higher levels of a hierarchy with some use of other concepts, such as genre, at lower levels.

Behaviour and Information Technology
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Personal Information Management and User Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.