Rethinking Matrix Instruction: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Pedagogical Challenges

This study aims to analyze students’ problem-solving skills in the matrix topic and to identify instructional constraints that influence the learning process. A mixed-methods approach was employed: the quantitative phase involved an eight-session expository intervention (90 minutes per session) and an assessment consisting of 30 multiple-choice and 5 essay questions (scored 0–100), while the qualitative phase included open-ended interviews with the teacher responsible for matrix instruction. Quantitative findings revealed that most students remained at the basic mastery level, with an average score of 26.82 and a distribution dominated by the “Low” category. Only 3.88% of students reached the “Good” level, and a binomial test confirmed that this proportion was significantly lower than the reference threshold (p < 0.001), reinforcing the conclusion that student performance fell short of expected standards. These findings highlight the urgent need for early diagnosis of foundational algebra skills—such as row-column operations and linear equation manipulation—before introducing more complex matrix concepts. The qualitative analysis revealed that although the teacher still employed expository methods—lectures, question and answer, and open discussions—these strategies were insufficient for fostering deep problem-solving skills. Students often relied on mechanical procedures without conceptual understanding, struggled to connect algebraic notation to real-world contexts, and lost motivation when facing multi-step problems. The combined results suggest that instructional design should shift toward more contextual and concept-exploratory approaches. Strategic steps are recommended, including the adoption of structured problem-solving methods to improve learning outcomes in mathematics. Furthermore, curriculum development should allocate sufficient time and resources to matrix topics, provide professional development for teachers in designing innovative instruction, and ensure access to digital infrastructure that supports mathematical visualization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v4i1.3399
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Matrix Instruction: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Pedagogical Challenges

Rasyidin Rasyidin
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Rethinking Matrix Instruction: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Pedagogical Challenges

Rasyidin Rasyidin
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ problem-solving skills in the matrix topic and to identify instructional constraints that influence the learning process. A mixed-methods approach was employed: the quantitative phase involved an eight-session expository intervention (90 minutes per session) and an assessment consisting of 30 multiple-choice and 5 essay questions (scored 0–100), while the qualitative phase included open-ended interviews with the teacher responsible for matrix instruction. Quantitative findings revealed that most students remained at the basic mastery level, with an average score of 26.82 and a distribution dominated by the “Low” category. Only 3.88% of students reached the “Good” level, and a binomial test confirmed that this proportion was significantly lower than the reference threshold (p < 0.001), reinforcing the conclusion that student performance fell short of expected standards. These findings highlight the urgent need for early diagnosis of foundational algebra skills—such as row-column operations and linear equation manipulation—before introducing more complex matrix concepts. The qualitative analysis revealed that although the teacher still employed expository methods—lectures, question and answer, and open discussions—these strategies were insufficient for fostering deep problem-solving skills. Students often relied on mechanical procedures without conceptual understanding, struggled to connect algebraic notation to real-world contexts, and lost motivation when facing multi-step problems. The combined results suggest that instructional design should shift toward more contextual and concept-exploratory approaches. Strategic steps are recommended, including the adoption of structured problem-solving methods to improve learning outcomes in mathematics. Furthermore, curriculum development should allocate sufficient time and resources to matrix topics, provide professional development for teachers in designing innovative instruction, and ensure access to digital infrastructure that supports mathematical visualization.

International Journal of Essential Competencies in EducationVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rethinking Matrix Instruction: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Pedagogical Challenges — Rasyidin Rasyidin · International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS