Genomic Signatures of Climate‐Driven (Mal)Adaptation in an Iconic Conifer, the English Yew ( <i>Taxus baccata</i> L.)

The risk of climate maladaptation is increasing for numerous species, including trees. Developing robust methods to assess population maladaptation remains a critical challenge. Genomic offset approaches aim to predict climate maladaptation by characterizing the genomic changes required for populations to maintain their fitness under changing climates. In this study, we assessed the risk of climate maladaptation in European populations of English yew (<i>Taxus baccata</i>), a long-lived tree with a patchy distribution across Europe, the Atlas Mountains, and the Near East, where many populations are small or threatened. We found evidence suggesting local climate adaptation by analyzing 8616 SNPs in 475 trees from 29 European <i>T. baccata</i> populations, with climate explaining 18.1% of genetic variance and 100 unlinked climate-associated loci identified via genotype-environment association (GEA). Then, we evaluated the deviation of populations from the overall gene-climate association to assess variability in local adaptation or different adaptation trajectories across populations and found the highest deviations in low latitude populations. Moreover, we predicted genomic offsets and successfully validated these predictions using phenotypic traits assessed in plants from 26 populations grown in a comparative experiment. Finally, we integrated information from current local adaptation, genomic offset, historical genetic differentiation, and effective migration rates to show that Mediterranean and high-elevation <i>T. baccata</i> populations face higher vulnerability to climate change than low-elevation Atlantic and continental populations. Our study demonstrates the practical use of the genomic offset framework in conservation genetics, offers insights for its further development, and highlights the need for a population-centered approach that incorporates additional statistics and data sources to credibly assess climate vulnerability in wild plant populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evolutionary Applications
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.70160
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic Signatures of Climate‐Driven (Mal)Adaptation in an Iconic Conifer, the English Yew ( Taxus baccata L.)

Maurizio Marchi, Miquel Riba, Santiago C. González‐Martínez, Marjana Westergren et al.
3 citations
Evolutionary Applications
Genetic diversity and population structure
5.45
article

Genomic Signatures of Climate‐Driven (Mal)Adaptation in an Iconic Conifer, the English Yew ( Taxus baccata L.)

Maurizio Marchi, Miquel Riba, Santiago C. González‐Martínez, Marjana Westergren, Juliette Archambeau, Thomas Francisco, Bruno Fady, Francesca Bagnoli, Andrea Piotti, Stephen Cavers, Giovanni G. Vendramin, Anna‐Maria Farsakoglou, María Mayol, Elia Vajana, Sara Pinosio, Ivan Scotti, Filippos A. Aravanopoulos
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The risk of climate maladaptation is increasing for numerous species, including trees. Developing robust methods to assess population maladaptation remains a critical challenge. Genomic offset approaches aim to predict climate maladaptation by characterizing the genomic changes required for populations to maintain their fitness under changing climates. In this study, we assessed the risk of climate maladaptation in European populations of English yew (<i>Taxus baccata</i>), a long-lived tree with a patchy distribution across Europe, the Atlas Mountains, and the Near East, where many populations are small or threatened. We found evidence suggesting local climate adaptation by analyzing 8616 SNPs in 475 trees from 29 European <i>T. baccata</i> populations, with climate explaining 18.1% of genetic variance and 100 unlinked climate-associated loci identified via genotype-environment association (GEA). Then, we evaluated the deviation of populations from the overall gene-climate association to assess variability in local adaptation or different adaptation trajectories across populations and found the highest deviations in low latitude populations. Moreover, we predicted genomic offsets and successfully validated these predictions using phenotypic traits assessed in plants from 26 populations grown in a comparative experiment. Finally, we integrated information from current local adaptation, genomic offset, historical genetic differentiation, and effective migration rates to show that Mediterranean and high-elevation <i>T. baccata</i> populations face higher vulnerability to climate change than low-elevation Atlantic and continental populations. Our study demonstrates the practical use of the genomic offset framework in conservation genetics, offers insights for its further development, and highlights the need for a population-centered approach that incorporates additional statistics and data sources to credibly assess climate vulnerability in wild plant populations.

Evolutionary ApplicationsVol. 18(10)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources (IT), Slovenian Forestry Institute (SI), Écologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes (FR), Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications (ES), UMR BIOdiversity, GEnes & Communities (FR), National Research Council (IT)
European Commission, Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Federal Aviation Administration, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Genetic diversity and population structure
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.