Life cycle assessment of whiteleg shrimp farming in earthen vs. HDPE-lined ponds in India

Whiteleg shrimp ( Penaeus vannamei ) farming has expanded rapidly worldwide, contributing significantly to global seafood supply. However, concerns remain about its environmental impacts, particularly in India—a major exporter with diverse production systems. High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE)-lined ponds and earthen ponds are widely used, but their comparative environmental performance has not been comprehensively evaluated. This study aimed to quantify and compare the environmental impacts of intensive HDPE-lined and semi-intensive earthen pond shrimp farming systems along India's west coast. A cradle-to-farm-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted using SimaPro software and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint method. Primary data were collected from 20 farms and one hatchery, covering seed production, feed use, and energy consumption. Environmental impacts were assessed across multiple categories, including Global Warming Potential (GWP), Terrestrial Acidification Potential (AC), and Marine Eutrophication Potential (EU). Results showed that HDPE-lined ponds had significantly higher GWP (369.04 vs. 268.06 kg CO 2 eq) and AC (1.20 vs. 0.94 kg SO 2 eq) per tonne of shrimp compared to earthen ponds, but lower EU (0.03 vs. 0.05 kg N eq). Seed production, electricity use, and feed emerged as the primary contributors to environmental impacts. Findings suggest that transitioning from HDPE-lined to earthen pond systems, adopting renewable energy sources such as solar aeration, and replacing fishmeal with plant-based alternatives could substantially improve the sustainability of Indian shrimp aquaculture. • HDPE-lined ponds exhibited 27.4 % higher CO 2 emissions per ton of shrimp produced compared to earthen ponds. • Seed production, formulated feed, and electricity usage were the primary contributors to GHG emissions in both pond systems. • Despite higher energy input, HDPE-lined ponds showed lower marine eutrophication potential, primarily due to more efficient feed usage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100342
Primary Topic
Agricultural Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of whiteleg shrimp farming in earthen vs. HDPE-lined ponds in India

Trivesh Mayekar, Venkatesh Paramesh, Chandrashekher U. Rivonker, Anil Kumar et al.
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Agricultural Systems and Practices
article

Life cycle assessment of whiteleg shrimp farming in earthen vs. HDPE-lined ponds in India

Trivesh Mayekar, Venkatesh Paramesh, Chandrashekher U. Rivonker, Anil Kumar, G. B. Sreekanth
article en

Abstract

Whiteleg shrimp ( Penaeus vannamei ) farming has expanded rapidly worldwide, contributing significantly to global seafood supply. However, concerns remain about its environmental impacts, particularly in India—a major exporter with diverse production systems. High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE)-lined ponds and earthen ponds are widely used, but their comparative environmental performance has not been comprehensively evaluated. This study aimed to quantify and compare the environmental impacts of intensive HDPE-lined and semi-intensive earthen pond shrimp farming systems along India's west coast. A cradle-to-farm-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted using SimaPro software and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint method. Primary data were collected from 20 farms and one hatchery, covering seed production, feed use, and energy consumption. Environmental impacts were assessed across multiple categories, including Global Warming Potential (GWP), Terrestrial Acidification Potential (AC), and Marine Eutrophication Potential (EU). Results showed that HDPE-lined ponds had significantly higher GWP (369.04 vs. 268.06 kg CO 2 eq) and AC (1.20 vs. 0.94 kg SO 2 eq) per tonne of shrimp compared to earthen ponds, but lower EU (0.03 vs. 0.05 kg N eq). Seed production, electricity use, and feed emerged as the primary contributors to environmental impacts. Findings suggest that transitioning from HDPE-lined to earthen pond systems, adopting renewable energy sources such as solar aeration, and replacing fishmeal with plant-based alternatives could substantially improve the sustainability of Indian shrimp aquaculture. • HDPE-lined ponds exhibited 27.4 % higher CO 2 emissions per ton of shrimp produced compared to earthen ponds. • Seed production, formulated feed, and electricity usage were the primary contributors to GHG emissions in both pond systems. • Despite higher energy input, HDPE-lined ponds showed lower marine eutrophication potential, primarily due to more efficient feed usage.

Cleaner Environmental SystemsVol. 19
Goa University (IN), Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Agricultural Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.