Machine learning models to predict hot carcass weight of Angus feedlot cattle at induction in commercial conditions

In modern feedlot management, the ability to accurately predict hot carcass weight at induction is critical for optimising operations and profitability. This study utilised a dataset of 40,310 records of Angus cattle from a commercial feedlot in Central Victoria (Australia) to forecast hot carcass weight from induction data including induction weight, month of induction, sex, and origin, and four variables collected throughout the production cycle: days on feed, disease (yes or no), and weather-related variables (number of days with rainfall above 5 mm and number of days with temperatures exceeding 35°C between induction and slaughter dates). Four statistical and machine learning models were used: linear regression with stepwise variable selection, support vector machines, random forest, and cubist model. Cubist model presented the best precision being slightly better with weather data (R 2 = 0.70, MAE = 20.02 kg, RSME = 27.94 kg) compared to no weather data (R 2 = 0.67, MAE=21.00 kg, RSME=29.16 kg) but Cubist model showed the lowest accuracy as measured by mean bias (-0.56 kg) and slope between observed and predicted values (0.92 ± 0.006). In addition, random forest showed slightly lower precision (R 2 = 0.69) than cubist model in all scenarios but greater accuracy as measured by mean bias (-0.41), intercept (-2.39 ± 2.26) and slope (1.01 ± 0.007), Linear model with stepwise variable selection and support vector machines shower lower precision (R2 = 0.64) but greater accuracy (mean bias = -0.47; intercept = 2.81 ± 2.50; slope = 0.99 ± 0.007) than cubist model. Further research is required to improve the accuracy of predicting hot carcass weight potentially including more predictors such as genetic information, diet composition, or data collected throughout the production cycle, particularly with technologies collecting data in real-time in the pen. However, the present research laid the groundwork for machine learning technologies to boost operational efficiencies and decision-making processes in the feedlot industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101496
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning models to predict hot carcass weight of Angus feedlot cattle at induction in commercial conditions

Ning Han, Thomas F. A. Bishop, L. A. González
1 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.75
article

Machine learning models to predict hot carcass weight of Angus feedlot cattle at induction in commercial conditions

Ning Han, Thomas F. A. Bishop, L. A. González
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In modern feedlot management, the ability to accurately predict hot carcass weight at induction is critical for optimising operations and profitability. This study utilised a dataset of 40,310 records of Angus cattle from a commercial feedlot in Central Victoria (Australia) to forecast hot carcass weight from induction data including induction weight, month of induction, sex, and origin, and four variables collected throughout the production cycle: days on feed, disease (yes or no), and weather-related variables (number of days with rainfall above 5 mm and number of days with temperatures exceeding 35°C between induction and slaughter dates). Four statistical and machine learning models were used: linear regression with stepwise variable selection, support vector machines, random forest, and cubist model. Cubist model presented the best precision being slightly better with weather data (R 2 = 0.70, MAE = 20.02 kg, RSME = 27.94 kg) compared to no weather data (R 2 = 0.67, MAE=21.00 kg, RSME=29.16 kg) but Cubist model showed the lowest accuracy as measured by mean bias (-0.56 kg) and slope between observed and predicted values (0.92 ± 0.006). In addition, random forest showed slightly lower precision (R 2 = 0.69) than cubist model in all scenarios but greater accuracy as measured by mean bias (-0.41), intercept (-2.39 ± 2.26) and slope (1.01 ± 0.007), Linear model with stepwise variable selection and support vector machines shower lower precision (R2 = 0.64) but greater accuracy (mean bias = -0.47; intercept = 2.81 ± 2.50; slope = 0.99 ± 0.007) than cubist model. Further research is required to improve the accuracy of predicting hot carcass weight potentially including more predictors such as genetic information, diet composition, or data collected throughout the production cycle, particularly with technologies collecting data in real-time in the pen. However, the present research laid the groundwork for machine learning technologies to boost operational efficiencies and decision-making processes in the feedlot industry.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 12
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Smart Agriculture and AI
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.