Data from Recommendations for Validating Omics Prediction Models: Insights from a Lung Cancer RNA Biomarker Study

<div>AbstractBackground:<p>External validation of predictive models in medical research is crucial to ensure their generalizability and applicability across diverse populations. However, validation often reveals discrepancies in model performance due to cohort differences, sample collection and storage, overfitting, and inconsistencies in data handling. This study investigates the challenges encountered during external validation of predictive models for early lung cancer detection using small RNA biomarkers, tying these challenges to specific validation outcomes and deriving recommendations.</p>Methods:<p>Predictive models based on the XGBoost algorithm, developed from serum samples in the JanusRNA cohort, were externally validated in two independent Norwegian cohorts: HUNT and Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. These cohorts differed in sample types, RNA abundance, library preparation protocols, and lung cancer histologic classification. Strategies to harmonize data processing and address these discrepancies were used to ensure a robust validation process.</p>Results:<p>Validation revealed significant challenges due to cohort heterogeneity. Median AUC values ranged from 0.50 to 0.66 in validation cohorts, compared with 0.62 to 0.76 in the original models. Models performed worse in the female-only Norwegian Women and Cancer Study cohort, in which plasma was used, highlighting the impact of sample type and cohort characteristics on predictive accuracy.</p>Conclusion:<p>Based on the challenges encountered during validation, we propose seven recommendations to guide robust external validation of omics-based predictive models, including harmonizing data processing across cohorts, reevaluating overfitting, and critically assessing model performance for clinical applications.</p>Impact:<p>By highlighting practical issues in model validation and providing recommendations, this study supports more reliable and clinically applicable biomarker-based prediction models, ultimately aiding cancer screening and prevention efforts.</p></div>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.c.8069391
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data from Recommendations for Validating Omics Prediction Models: Insights from a Lung Cancer RNA Biomarker Study

Ilona Urbárová, Oluf Dimitri Røe, Trine B. Rounge, Renée T. Fortner et al.
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
article

Data from Recommendations for Validating Omics Prediction Models: Insights from a Lung Cancer RNA Biomarker Study

Ilona Urbárová, Oluf Dimitri Røe, Trine B. Rounge, Renée T. Fortner, Therese Haugdahl Nøst, Hilde Langseth, Luca Pestarino, Ioannis Fotopoulos
article en

Abstract

<div>AbstractBackground:<p>External validation of predictive models in medical research is crucial to ensure their generalizability and applicability across diverse populations. However, validation often reveals discrepancies in model performance due to cohort differences, sample collection and storage, overfitting, and inconsistencies in data handling. This study investigates the challenges encountered during external validation of predictive models for early lung cancer detection using small RNA biomarkers, tying these challenges to specific validation outcomes and deriving recommendations.</p>Methods:<p>Predictive models based on the XGBoost algorithm, developed from serum samples in the JanusRNA cohort, were externally validated in two independent Norwegian cohorts: HUNT and Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. These cohorts differed in sample types, RNA abundance, library preparation protocols, and lung cancer histologic classification. Strategies to harmonize data processing and address these discrepancies were used to ensure a robust validation process.</p>Results:<p>Validation revealed significant challenges due to cohort heterogeneity. Median AUC values ranged from 0.50 to 0.66 in validation cohorts, compared with 0.62 to 0.76 in the original models. Models performed worse in the female-only Norwegian Women and Cancer Study cohort, in which plasma was used, highlighting the impact of sample type and cohort characteristics on predictive accuracy.</p>Conclusion:<p>Based on the challenges encountered during validation, we propose seven recommendations to guide robust external validation of omics-based predictive models, including harmonizing data processing across cohorts, reevaluating overfitting, and critically assessing model performance for clinical applications.</p>Impact:<p>By highlighting practical issues in model validation and providing recommendations, this study supports more reliable and clinically applicable biomarker-based prediction models, ultimately aiding cancer screening and prevention efforts.</p></div>

Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.