Just saying sorry—The effect of apologies on reintegration after social exclusion

Apologies are ubiquitous in life and across cultures and countries, and they are able to impact social relationships as well as material outcomes. One specific application refers to restorative justice and mediation programs. While empirical data is biased by unobservable influences, a controlled experiment provides additional evidence on the effect of apologies after exclusion. We present an experiment in which participants can steal from other group members and can be excluded for one period. We compare four treatments in which we give the option to apologize (or not) and where apologies can be tracked (or not). We find that apologizing significantly reduces theft and participants who apologize experience more re-integrative behavior from the rest of the group members than those who do not apologize. Additionally, we find that people do apologize even when their apologies cannot be tracked, suggesting that apologies are not purely used as a strategic device.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107246
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Just saying sorry—The effect of apologies on reintegration after social exclusion

Tarek Jaber-López, Alexandra Baier
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

Just saying sorry—The effect of apologies on reintegration after social exclusion

Tarek Jaber-López, Alexandra Baier
article en

Abstract

Apologies are ubiquitous in life and across cultures and countries, and they are able to impact social relationships as well as material outcomes. One specific application refers to restorative justice and mediation programs. While empirical data is biased by unobservable influences, a controlled experiment provides additional evidence on the effect of apologies after exclusion. We present an experiment in which participants can steal from other group members and can be excluded for one period. We compare four treatments in which we give the option to apologize (or not) and where apologies can be tracked (or not). We find that apologizing significantly reduces theft and participants who apologize experience more re-integrative behavior from the rest of the group members than those who do not apologize. Additionally, we find that people do apologize even when their apologies cannot be tracked, suggesting that apologies are not purely used as a strategic device.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 239
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.