Assessment of combined nutrients and pesticides grey water footprint in a sub-Saharan African lake catchment

Water scarcity and pollution are pressing challenges in agricultural catchments. This study quantified the Grey Water Footprint (GWF) of nutrients and pesticide residues in the Lake Naivasha catchment, Kenya, and assessed spatial patterns of pollution stress. Mean daily discharge ranged from 0.03 ± 0.01 m 3 s −1 at Little Gilgil (G2) to 2.95 ± 1.78 m 3 s −1 at Malewa Highway Bridge (M5). The highest nutrient-related GWF was recorded for total phosphorus at Karati (K1), 5.3 × 10 6 ± 1.6 × 10 6 mm 3 year −1 , while the lowest values were observed at the downstream Malewa sites (M4 and M5). For pesticides, cyclodienes peaked at K1 with values ranging from 1.59 × 10 5 ± 3.52 × 10 4 mm 3 year −1 for dieldrin to 81.9 ± 32.7 mm 3 year −1 for methoxychlor, while DDT and HCH groups ranged from 0.34 ± 0.08 mm 3 year −1 for γ-HCH at Malewa to 3.80 × 10 6 ± 1.67 × 10 6 mm 3 year −1 for pp-DDT at Karati. The Integrated Grey Water Footprint (IGWF) showed that pesticides dominated pollution stress at most sites, except Karati where phosphorus loads were highest. Grey Water Stress (GWS) exceeded unity (>1) at Karati, indicating that pollutant loads surpassed the river's assimilative capacity, while other sites remained below capacity, ranging from 2 to 4 % at Malewa (M1) to 10–20 % at Little Gilgil (G2). These findings highlight pollution hotspots in low-flow sub-catchments, driven by intensive farming and settlements, and underscore the urgent need for integrated water quality standards and advanced monitoring strategies to safeguard aquatic ecosystems and promote sustainable water management in sub-Saharan Africa. • Low assimilative capacity are cause critical water quality degradation. • Organochlorine pesticides are key contributors to the high GWF & GWS. • Spatial pollution hotspots in lower sub-catchments need urgent remediation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100958
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of combined nutrients and pesticides grey water footprint in a sub-Saharan African lake catchment

John P. Simaika, Joel Onyango, Nzula Kitaka, Kenneth Irvine
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
article

Assessment of combined nutrients and pesticides grey water footprint in a sub-Saharan African lake catchment

John P. Simaika, Joel Onyango, Nzula Kitaka, Kenneth Irvine
article en

Abstract

Water scarcity and pollution are pressing challenges in agricultural catchments. This study quantified the Grey Water Footprint (GWF) of nutrients and pesticide residues in the Lake Naivasha catchment, Kenya, and assessed spatial patterns of pollution stress. Mean daily discharge ranged from 0.03 ± 0.01 m 3 s −1 at Little Gilgil (G2) to 2.95 ± 1.78 m 3 s −1 at Malewa Highway Bridge (M5). The highest nutrient-related GWF was recorded for total phosphorus at Karati (K1), 5.3 × 10 6 ± 1.6 × 10 6 mm 3 year −1 , while the lowest values were observed at the downstream Malewa sites (M4 and M5). For pesticides, cyclodienes peaked at K1 with values ranging from 1.59 × 10 5 ± 3.52 × 10 4 mm 3 year −1 for dieldrin to 81.9 ± 32.7 mm 3 year −1 for methoxychlor, while DDT and HCH groups ranged from 0.34 ± 0.08 mm 3 year −1 for γ-HCH at Malewa to 3.80 × 10 6 ± 1.67 × 10 6 mm 3 year −1 for pp-DDT at Karati. The Integrated Grey Water Footprint (IGWF) showed that pesticides dominated pollution stress at most sites, except Karati where phosphorus loads were highest. Grey Water Stress (GWS) exceeded unity (>1) at Karati, indicating that pollutant loads surpassed the river's assimilative capacity, while other sites remained below capacity, ranging from 2 to 4 % at Malewa (M1) to 10–20 % at Little Gilgil (G2). These findings highlight pollution hotspots in low-flow sub-catchments, driven by intensive farming and settlements, and underscore the urgent need for integrated water quality standards and advanced monitoring strategies to safeguard aquatic ecosystems and promote sustainable water management in sub-Saharan Africa. • Low assimilative capacity are cause critical water quality degradation. • Organochlorine pesticides are key contributors to the high GWF & GWS. • Spatial pollution hotspots in lower sub-catchments need urgent remediation.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 28
Egerton University (KE), IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL), African Centre for Technology Studies (KE), International Water Management Institute (IWMI) (LK), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.