A tool to probe domain-general syntax: Simple and complex actions with a tool improve syntactic comprehension in language

• Language and motor processes share a domain-general syntactic function • Motor training can produce a learning transfer to the language domain • Performance in language improved after tool-use training compared to hand training • Complex actions combined with tool-use might enhance this effect • Tool-use dexterity is a good predictor of syntactic performance in language Language is a complex faculty made up of different components, many of which are based on sensorimotor processes. In this study, we focused on syntax, which is known for its role in sentence construction, but also in goal-directed actions like toolmaking or tool-use. It has been shown that syntactic processes in language and tool-use share common neural resources, therefore benefiting one from the other. Here, we investigated behaviorally the relationship between manual action and language comprehension. We varied the complexity of manual action along two independent dimensions: the length of the action sequence and whether participants used their hand or a tool. A cohort of 80 adult participants underwent a learning transfer protocol consisting of a syntactic comprehension test before and after being trained in the motor task. Our results showed that the use of a tool is crucial for allowing a learning transfer to occur from the motor to the language domains: regardless of the complexity of action sequences, participants performed significantly better in the syntactic comprehension task after tool-use training, but not after bare hand training. Our results also suggested that complex actions combined with tool-use might enhance this effect and that inter-individual tool-use dexterity is a good predictor of syntactic performance in language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Research in Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2025.100190
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A tool to probe domain-general syntax: Simple and complex actions with a tool improve syntactic comprehension in language

Marie Montant, Raphaël Py, Marie‐Hélène Grosbras, Claudio Brozzoli
2 citations
Current Research in Behavioral Sciences
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
4.24
article

A tool to probe domain-general syntax: Simple and complex actions with a tool improve syntactic comprehension in language

Marie Montant, Raphaël Py, Marie‐Hélène Grosbras, Claudio Brozzoli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Language and motor processes share a domain-general syntactic function • Motor training can produce a learning transfer to the language domain • Performance in language improved after tool-use training compared to hand training • Complex actions combined with tool-use might enhance this effect • Tool-use dexterity is a good predictor of syntactic performance in language Language is a complex faculty made up of different components, many of which are based on sensorimotor processes. In this study, we focused on syntax, which is known for its role in sentence construction, but also in goal-directed actions like toolmaking or tool-use. It has been shown that syntactic processes in language and tool-use share common neural resources, therefore benefiting one from the other. Here, we investigated behaviorally the relationship between manual action and language comprehension. We varied the complexity of manual action along two independent dimensions: the length of the action sequence and whether participants used their hand or a tool. A cohort of 80 adult participants underwent a learning transfer protocol consisting of a syntactic comprehension test before and after being trained in the motor task. Our results showed that the use of a tool is crucial for allowing a learning transfer to occur from the motor to the language domains: regardless of the complexity of action sequences, participants performed significantly better in the syntactic comprehension task after tool-use training, but not after bare hand training. Our results also suggested that complex actions combined with tool-use might enhance this effect and that inter-individual tool-use dexterity is a good predictor of syntactic performance in language.

Current Research in Behavioral SciencesVol. 9
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), Institut Pasteur (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR), Clinique Victor Hugo (FR), Délégation Régionale Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes (FR)
James S. McDonnell Foundation, Aix-Marseille Université, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, CHIST-ERA
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.