Evaluating ChatGPT’s Reliability in Grading Writing Assignments on the EOP Learning Platform

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being used more and more in education, utilizing AI to grade the writing of students is a concern for trustworthiness. Using a mixed-methods research design that combines both quantitative and qualitative data collection tools -questionnaires and semi-structured interviews - this study investigates the reliability of using ChatGPT to mark students' writing assignments on the EOP online learning platform (https://eop.edu.vn/) compared with human evaluators at the School of Languages and Tourism, Hanoi University of Industry. The findings provide the advantages and limitations of AI-supported grading, highlighting the accuracy, consistency, and alignment with human grading criteria of AI grading. The attitudes of teachers toward AI scoring are also examined in this paper to determine its accuracy. Recommendations for enhancing AI scoring systems to enable more effective and fairer assessments are provided based on the findings. The research contributes to the academic literature on the use of AI in education, emphasizing the importance of sustaining the enhancement of AI-driven evaluation tools to enable effective and fairer online learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ICTE Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54855/979-8-9870112-8-7_1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating ChatGPT’s Reliability in Grading Writing Assignments on the EOP Learning Platform

Yen Van Tran, T Le
ICTE Conference Proceedings
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating ChatGPT’s Reliability in Grading Writing Assignments on the EOP Learning Platform

Yen Van Tran, T Le
article en

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being used more and more in education, utilizing AI to grade the writing of students is a concern for trustworthiness. Using a mixed-methods research design that combines both quantitative and qualitative data collection tools -questionnaires and semi-structured interviews - this study investigates the reliability of using ChatGPT to mark students' writing assignments on the EOP online learning platform (https://eop.edu.vn/) compared with human evaluators at the School of Languages and Tourism, Hanoi University of Industry. The findings provide the advantages and limitations of AI-supported grading, highlighting the accuracy, consistency, and alignment with human grading criteria of AI grading. The attitudes of teachers toward AI scoring are also examined in this paper to determine its accuracy. Recommendations for enhancing AI scoring systems to enable more effective and fairer assessments are provided based on the findings. The research contributes to the academic literature on the use of AI in education, emphasizing the importance of sustaining the enhancement of AI-driven evaluation tools to enable effective and fairer online learning.

ICTE Conference ProceedingsVol. 7
Hanoi University of Industry (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.