Performance-based metacognitive tests versus self-report: what does prediction tell us?

The evidence corroborated both hypotheses and raises doubts about the quality of self-report tests for measuring cognition regulation. It also indicates that standardized performance-based tests have a similar predictive capacity to tasks that require performance. This result is promising because standardized tests are easy to apply and correct, allowing studies to be carried out on large samples, while performance-based tasks require a complex process, only feasible in studies on small samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-025-00337-2
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance-based metacognitive tests versus self-report: what does prediction tell us?

Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes, Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi, Jhonys de Araujo
Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Performance-based metacognitive tests versus self-report: what does prediction tell us?

Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes, Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi, Jhonys de Araujo
article en

Abstract

The evidence corroborated both hypotheses and raises doubts about the quality of self-report tests for measuring cognition regulation. It also indicates that standardized performance-based tests have a similar predictive capacity to tasks that require performance. This result is promising because standardized tests are easy to apply and correct, allowing studies to be carried out on large samples, while performance-based tasks require a complex process, only feasible in studies on small samples.

Psicologia Reflexão e CríticaVol. 38(1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.