Enhancing knowledge tracing through course map and question difficulty analysis

Knowledge tracing (KT) has enhanced students’ learning efficiency in online systems by modeling how students learn over time based on their interactions with educational content. It has gained significant research attention recently due to its crucial importance in intelligent education. Nonetheless, current knowledge tracing (KT) methods have not adequately explored and utilized the impact of concept relations and question difficulty level on students’ knowledge state during learning. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the effect of the concept map and question difficulty on learning and proposing the Course Map and Difficulty-enhanced Knowledge Tracing (CMDKT) model to enhance students’ knowledge state assessment. Experiments on ASSIST09 and DBE-KT22 show CMDKT improves predictive performance over strong baselines (e.g., +2.47% AUC and +2.32% ACC on average across datasets), while also reducing MAE and RMSE compared to DKT and GKT. • CMDKT model integrates concept maps and question difficulty for enhanced knowledge tracing By modeling both prerequisite concept relationships and difficulty levels, CMDKT improves accuracy in predicting students’ knowledge states. • CMDKT outperforms state-of-the-art models like DKT and GKT across datasets Achieved up to 2.47% improvement in AUC and 2.32% increase in accuracy, demonstrating strong generalizability across both ASSIST09 and DBE-KT22 datasets. • CMDKT captures learning complexity via dual GRU architecture One GRU models concept dependencies (topology embedding), while the other captures temporal knowledge progression for better personalization. • CMDKT shows consistent gains as more concept prerequisites are included Performance improves steadily (e.g., ACC from 0.7845 to 0.7976) as the percentage of concept prerequisite pairs increases, validating the importance of relational learning structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Array
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100523
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing knowledge tracing through course map and question difficulty analysis

A. Li, Hui Yin, Guozhe Jin, Jianing Xia
Array
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Enhancing knowledge tracing through course map and question difficulty analysis

A. Li, Hui Yin, Guozhe Jin, Jianing Xia
article en

Abstract

Knowledge tracing (KT) has enhanced students’ learning efficiency in online systems by modeling how students learn over time based on their interactions with educational content. It has gained significant research attention recently due to its crucial importance in intelligent education. Nonetheless, current knowledge tracing (KT) methods have not adequately explored and utilized the impact of concept relations and question difficulty level on students’ knowledge state during learning. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the effect of the concept map and question difficulty on learning and proposing the Course Map and Difficulty-enhanced Knowledge Tracing (CMDKT) model to enhance students’ knowledge state assessment. Experiments on ASSIST09 and DBE-KT22 show CMDKT improves predictive performance over strong baselines (e.g., +2.47% AUC and +2.32% ACC on average across datasets), while also reducing MAE and RMSE compared to DKT and GKT. • CMDKT model integrates concept maps and question difficulty for enhanced knowledge tracing By modeling both prerequisite concept relationships and difficulty levels, CMDKT improves accuracy in predicting students’ knowledge states. • CMDKT outperforms state-of-the-art models like DKT and GKT across datasets Achieved up to 2.47% improvement in AUC and 2.32% increase in accuracy, demonstrating strong generalizability across both ASSIST09 and DBE-KT22 datasets. • CMDKT captures learning complexity via dual GRU architecture One GRU models concept dependencies (topology embedding), while the other captures temporal knowledge progression for better personalization. • CMDKT shows consistent gains as more concept prerequisites are included Performance improves steadily (e.g., ACC from 0.7845 to 0.7976) as the percentage of concept prerequisite pairs increases, validating the importance of relational learning structure.

ArrayVol. 28
Yanbian University (CN), Universal Biosensors (Australia) (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), Victoria University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.