Simulation in healthcare: Navigating the space between quality improvement and research

<h2>Abstract</h2> Simulation-based initiatives are increasingly integrated into healthcare settings, often responding to local concerns while also producing insights that contribute to wider scholarly and professional debates. In this context, the distinction between quality improvement and research is often blurred, and many projects incorporate elements of both. This paper argues that instead of treating quality improvement and research as fixed categories, it is more productive to reflect on how simulation initiatives are positioned in relation to their intended contributions to practice and knowledge. Drawing on insights from implementation science, I outline recurring challenges that arise when this reflection is absent, including difficulties with ethics, contextual transparency, and accessibility of findings. To support a more deliberate approach, the paper introduces a reflective illustration that helps situate simulation work without reducing it to predefined labels, thereby enhancing both its local value and its broader relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101824
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation in healthcare: Navigating the space between quality improvement and research

Anders Schram
1 citations
Clinical Simulation in Nursing
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
1.16
article

Simulation in healthcare: Navigating the space between quality improvement and research

Anders Schram
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2> Simulation-based initiatives are increasingly integrated into healthcare settings, often responding to local concerns while also producing insights that contribute to wider scholarly and professional debates. In this context, the distinction between quality improvement and research is often blurred, and many projects incorporate elements of both. This paper argues that instead of treating quality improvement and research as fixed categories, it is more productive to reflect on how simulation initiatives are positioned in relation to their intended contributions to practice and knowledge. Drawing on insights from implementation science, I outline recurring challenges that arise when this reflection is absent, including difficulties with ethics, contextual transparency, and accessibility of findings. To support a more deliberate approach, the paper introduces a reflective illustration that helps situate simulation work without reducing it to predefined labels, thereby enhancing both its local value and its broader relevance.

Clinical Simulation in NursingVol. 108
Aarhus University (DK), Central Denmark Region (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.