Mapping forage nutritional quality in temperate natural grasslands using interpretable machine learning

Accurate spatial prediction of forage nutritional quality is critical for optimizing livestock production and supporting regional food security planning. This study developed an interpretable machine learning framework based on Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms to generate high-resolution maps of key forage nutritional parameters—crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and neutral detergent fiber (NDF)—across natural grasslands in the Ili River Valley, Xinjiang, China. Our approach integrated 40 environmental covariates and explicitly accounted for both immediate and legacy climate effects through time-lag and accumulation analyses. Predictor selection was optimized using forward feature selection combined with k -fold nearest-neighbor distance matching cross-validation to reduce overfitting. Results indicated that climate variables significantly influenced forage quality via time-lag and accumulation effects, with distinct drivers identified for nutrient content versus pools: CP and EE content were primarily influenced by climate, whereas ADF and NDF content as well as all nutrient pools were predominantly driven by vegetation traits. Model performance varied considerably, with nutrient pools (R 2 = 0.63–0.73) being predicted more accurately than nutrient content (R 2 = 0.42–0.58). Spatially, high-quality forage was concentrated in mountain meadows and temperate meadow steppes, while low-quality forage was more prevalent in temperate desert steppes. Uncertainty analysis revealed higher prediction errors in desert steppes, likely due to limited sampling density and extreme environmental conditions. These findings offer a scientific basis for targeted grassland management and underscore the importance of appropriate model selection and covariate inclusion for reliable spatial predictions of forage quality. • Spatio-temporal ML modeling with climate legacy effects. • FFS-kNNDM reduces spatial overfitting in prediction. • SHAP reveals climate vs vegetation controls on forage nutritional quality. • Provision of 1-km resolution maps to support precision grassland management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103452
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping forage nutritional quality in temperate natural grasslands using interpretable machine learning

Tianci Chen, Xingxin Lu, Yanming Gong, Fusen Nan et al.
1 citations
Ecological Informatics
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
article

Mapping forage nutritional quality in temperate natural grasslands using interpretable machine learning

Tianci Chen, Xingxin Lu, Yanming Gong, Fusen Nan, Jianfei Yu, Xiaobo Wang, Kaihui Li, Xiaoqian Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate spatial prediction of forage nutritional quality is critical for optimizing livestock production and supporting regional food security planning. This study developed an interpretable machine learning framework based on Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms to generate high-resolution maps of key forage nutritional parameters—crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and neutral detergent fiber (NDF)—across natural grasslands in the Ili River Valley, Xinjiang, China. Our approach integrated 40 environmental covariates and explicitly accounted for both immediate and legacy climate effects through time-lag and accumulation analyses. Predictor selection was optimized using forward feature selection combined with k -fold nearest-neighbor distance matching cross-validation to reduce overfitting. Results indicated that climate variables significantly influenced forage quality via time-lag and accumulation effects, with distinct drivers identified for nutrient content versus pools: CP and EE content were primarily influenced by climate, whereas ADF and NDF content as well as all nutrient pools were predominantly driven by vegetation traits. Model performance varied considerably, with nutrient pools (R 2 = 0.63–0.73) being predicted more accurately than nutrient content (R 2 = 0.42–0.58). Spatially, high-quality forage was concentrated in mountain meadows and temperate meadow steppes, while low-quality forage was more prevalent in temperate desert steppes. Uncertainty analysis revealed higher prediction errors in desert steppes, likely due to limited sampling density and extreme environmental conditions. These findings offer a scientific basis for targeted grassland management and underscore the importance of appropriate model selection and covariate inclusion for reliable spatial predictions of forage quality. • Spatio-temporal ML modeling with climate legacy effects. • FFS-kNNDM reduces spatial overfitting in prediction. • SHAP reveals climate vs vegetation controls on forage nutritional quality. • Provision of 1-km resolution maps to support precision grassland management.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 92
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.