Testing the activity pacing questionnaire for validity, reliability and responsiveness: An outcome measure validation study

Activity pacing aims to manage symptoms of chronic pain and improve function by modifying pain-related behaviours: avoidance, overdoing and overdoing-underdoing cycling. Research regarding the effectiveness of activity pacing is unclear, and hindered by the absence of a validated scale. The previously developed 28-item Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ-28) comprises five domains: Activity adjustment, Activity planning, Activity consistency, Activity progression and Activity acceptance. This study aimed to shorten the APQ and provide evidence for its validity, reliability and responsiveness. Paper-based questionnaires collected data from patients with chronic pain attending healthcare services in England, UK, at baseline (n=347), and again at 2-weeks (n=130) and 12-weeks (n=121). Outcome measures included the APQ-28, and other measures of pacing, avoidance, overdoing, pain, self-efficacy, quality of life, physical/mental function, depression and anxiety. Statistical analyses explored validity, reliability, responsiveness and measurement error. Factor analysis (n=347) showed poor model fit for the previous five-factor model, leading to selecting a four-factor model (removing Activity acceptance) with three items per domain, forming the APQ-12 (CFI=0.995, TLI=0.992, RMSEA=0.052, SRMR=0.050). The four domains showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.70-0.84) and test-retest reliability (n=130, ICC=0.53-0.64). Only Activity consistency showed significant responsiveness (n=121, Rho=0.27, 95% CI=0.1-0.43). Measurement error of the APQ-12 domains included smallest detectable change (range=1.55-1.76), standard error of measurement (range=0.56-0.63) and minimally important change (range=-0.17-0.33). Confirmatory factor analysis on external data supported the four-domain structure (CFI=0.983, TLI=0.977, RMSEA=0.071, SRMR=0.106). The APQ-12 shows promise as a multi-domain measure of activity pacing for use in clinical practice and future research. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the psychometric properties of the 12-item Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ-12). The APQ-12 provides a multi-domain measure of activity pacing. It has potential clinical and research use to assess changes in activity pacing and explore the effects of activity pacing on symptoms of chronic pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105568
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the activity pacing questionnaire for validity, reliability and responsiveness: An outcome measure validation study

Melanie Ann Holden, Deborah Antcliff, Kathryn Cawley, Gareth McCray et al.
1 citations
Journal of Pain
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
5.77
article

Testing the activity pacing questionnaire for validity, reliability and responsiveness: An outcome measure validation study

Melanie Ann Holden, Deborah Antcliff, Kathryn Cawley, Gareth McCray, Janiece Marriott-Smith, R.C.F. Mackenzie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Activity pacing aims to manage symptoms of chronic pain and improve function by modifying pain-related behaviours: avoidance, overdoing and overdoing-underdoing cycling. Research regarding the effectiveness of activity pacing is unclear, and hindered by the absence of a validated scale. The previously developed 28-item Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ-28) comprises five domains: Activity adjustment, Activity planning, Activity consistency, Activity progression and Activity acceptance. This study aimed to shorten the APQ and provide evidence for its validity, reliability and responsiveness. Paper-based questionnaires collected data from patients with chronic pain attending healthcare services in England, UK, at baseline (n=347), and again at 2-weeks (n=130) and 12-weeks (n=121). Outcome measures included the APQ-28, and other measures of pacing, avoidance, overdoing, pain, self-efficacy, quality of life, physical/mental function, depression and anxiety. Statistical analyses explored validity, reliability, responsiveness and measurement error. Factor analysis (n=347) showed poor model fit for the previous five-factor model, leading to selecting a four-factor model (removing Activity acceptance) with three items per domain, forming the APQ-12 (CFI=0.995, TLI=0.992, RMSEA=0.052, SRMR=0.050). The four domains showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.70-0.84) and test-retest reliability (n=130, ICC=0.53-0.64). Only Activity consistency showed significant responsiveness (n=121, Rho=0.27, 95% CI=0.1-0.43). Measurement error of the APQ-12 domains included smallest detectable change (range=1.55-1.76), standard error of measurement (range=0.56-0.63) and minimally important change (range=-0.17-0.33). Confirmatory factor analysis on external data supported the four-domain structure (CFI=0.983, TLI=0.977, RMSEA=0.071, SRMR=0.106). The APQ-12 shows promise as a multi-domain measure of activity pacing for use in clinical practice and future research. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the psychometric properties of the 12-item Activity Pacing Questionnaire (APQ-12). The APQ-12 provides a multi-domain measure of activity pacing. It has potential clinical and research use to assess changes in activity pacing and explore the effects of activity pacing on symptoms of chronic pain.

Journal of PainVol. 37
NHS Lothian (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Northern Health and Social Care Trust (GB), Aintree University Hospital (GB), Keele University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.