Current practice and application of finite element analysis in clear aligners: A scoping review

Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has become increasingly popular in orthodontics; however, concerns persist about its predictability and effectiveness.The finite element method (FEM) has become an important tool for studying aligner biomechanics and force delivery, offering insights that are often hard to obtain clinically.This scoping review aimed to map FEM applications in CAT research and critically assess their methodological approaches, highlighting strengths, limitations, and areas for improvement.Six electronic databases were searched up to June 2, 2025.A total of 448 records were screened, resulting in 149 fulltext articles, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria.Studies were examined concerning model development, representation of the periodontal ligament (PDL) and bone, material property assignment, meshing strategies, boundary conditions, contact interactions, and post-processing analyses.Significant methodological variation was observed.About half of the studies modeled bone as a single structure, whereas others distinguished cortical from cancellous bone.Most assumed a linear, isotropic PDL, although some employed bilinear or nonlinear viscoelastic models.Boundary conditions usually fixed the maxilla and mandible, while contact constraints connected biologically linked tissues.Meshing strategies differed between native and external software, with tetrahedral elements being most common.Displacement was assessed using either global or local coordinate systems, influencing clinical interpretation.Stress analysis was primarily limited to von Mises stress, although a few reports also included principal stresses.Validation was infrequent, with only isolated attempts using radiological or in vitro data.FEM offers useful insights into CAT biomechanics, but its conclusions are constrained by methodological differences and a lack of validation.Developing standardized protocols is crucial for enhancing reproducibility and clinical applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seminars in Orthodontics
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2025.09.021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current practice and application of finite element analysis in clear aligners: A scoping review

Mohammed Al-Sammarraie, Bingshuang Zou, Paul W. Major, Dan L. Romanyk et al.
1 citations
Seminars in Orthodontics
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.24
article

Current practice and application of finite element analysis in clear aligners: A scoping review

Mohammed Al-Sammarraie, Bingshuang Zou, Paul W. Major, Dan L. Romanyk, Edwin H. Yen, Abdularaheem Al-Wafi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has become increasingly popular in orthodontics; however, concerns persist about its predictability and effectiveness.The finite element method (FEM) has become an important tool for studying aligner biomechanics and force delivery, offering insights that are often hard to obtain clinically.This scoping review aimed to map FEM applications in CAT research and critically assess their methodological approaches, highlighting strengths, limitations, and areas for improvement.Six electronic databases were searched up to June 2, 2025.A total of 448 records were screened, resulting in 149 fulltext articles, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria.Studies were examined concerning model development, representation of the periodontal ligament (PDL) and bone, material property assignment, meshing strategies, boundary conditions, contact interactions, and post-processing analyses.Significant methodological variation was observed.About half of the studies modeled bone as a single structure, whereas others distinguished cortical from cancellous bone.Most assumed a linear, isotropic PDL, although some employed bilinear or nonlinear viscoelastic models.Boundary conditions usually fixed the maxilla and mandible, while contact constraints connected biologically linked tissues.Meshing strategies differed between native and external software, with tetrahedral elements being most common.Displacement was assessed using either global or local coordinate systems, influencing clinical interpretation.Stress analysis was primarily limited to von Mises stress, although a few reports also included principal stresses.Validation was infrequent, with only isolated attempts using radiological or in vitro data.FEM offers useful insights into CAT biomechanics, but its conclusions are constrained by methodological differences and a lack of validation.Developing standardized protocols is crucial for enhancing reproducibility and clinical applicability.

Seminars in OrthodonticsVol. 32(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Alberta (CA), King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.