Statistical Evaluation of Outdoor Field Hockey Penalty Corners

Penalty corners stand out as pivotal goal-scoring opportunities in field hockey, crucial to a team’s triumph. This study harnesses data from women’s collegiate field hockey games to formulate a statistical model predicting the likelihood of scoring a penalty corner, contingent on the strategies deployed. Various machine learning algorithms are compared to ascertain the most predictive model and to dissect the paramount factors influencing penalty corners. The XGBoost model emerges superior, boasting an area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.667 on out-of-sample observations. With other predictors held constant, the model reveals that drag flicks, sweep shots, and deflections are positively associated with goal occurrences, while, intriguingly, direct shots—despite their prevalence—are negatively associated with scoring probability. KEYWORDS: College Sports; K-Nearest Neighbor; Lasso; Quantitative Analysis; Random Forest; Sporting Strategy; Sports Analytics; XGBoost

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Undergraduate Research
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2025.145
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Evaluation of Outdoor Field Hockey Penalty Corners

Samuel Hughes, Jun Yan, G. A. Matthews
American Journal of Undergraduate Research
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

Statistical Evaluation of Outdoor Field Hockey Penalty Corners

Samuel Hughes, Jun Yan, G. A. Matthews
article en

Abstract

Penalty corners stand out as pivotal goal-scoring opportunities in field hockey, crucial to a team’s triumph. This study harnesses data from women’s collegiate field hockey games to formulate a statistical model predicting the likelihood of scoring a penalty corner, contingent on the strategies deployed. Various machine learning algorithms are compared to ascertain the most predictive model and to dissect the paramount factors influencing penalty corners. The XGBoost model emerges superior, boasting an area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.667 on out-of-sample observations. With other predictors held constant, the model reveals that drag flicks, sweep shots, and deflections are positively associated with goal occurrences, while, intriguingly, direct shots—despite their prevalence—are negatively associated with scoring probability. KEYWORDS: College Sports; K-Nearest Neighbor; Lasso; Quantitative Analysis; Random Forest; Sporting Strategy; Sports Analytics; XGBoost

American Journal of Undergraduate ResearchVol. 22(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.