The Effect of Land Use Gradient on Adult Body Size of Bees in Eastern Tennessee

With the intensification of agricultural practices, bee habitats are undergoing changes, impacting the nutritional quality of resources available to bee larvae and leading to variation in adult body sizes. Because larger bee species can forage at greater distances from their nests, we predicted that intraspecific body size would respond differently to agricultural land use gradient depending on bee size at the species level. Our study emphasizes the effect of a varying agricultural land use gradient on adult body sizes of bees. Our experiment took place in East Tennessee where we established twenty plots each containing 18 native plant species, at five sites of varying agricultural land-uses, ranging from 6-48% agriculture. During the summer, using an insect vacuum, we collected 11,183 insects representing 99 bee species interacting with these native plants. We then haphazardly selected adult bees from 13 species that were found at all sites to measure their body size via intertegular distance (ITD). We found that the intraspecific adult body size of larger bees, such as Bombus impatiens, increased along with agricultural land use in the surrounding landscape. The body size of small and medium sized bee species did not change along the agricultural land use gradient. This indicates that agricultural land use affects bee species differently. Larger bees are able to forage at greater distances from their nests and carry more provisions, which might make them more resilient to agricultural land use. Smaller bees may be less resilient because they cannot forage as far. This is critical to consider for future landscape management practices to best ensure the pollination of crops. KEYWORDS: Pollinator Health; Wild Bees; Agriculture; Conservation; Spatial Ecology; Social Bees; Intertegular Distance; Land Use Change

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Undergraduate Research
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2025.147
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Land Use Gradient on Adult Body Size of Bees in Eastern Tennessee

Margaret E. Clark, Laura Russo, Karl McKim, Amani Khalil
American Journal of Undergraduate Research
Plant and animal studies
article

The Effect of Land Use Gradient on Adult Body Size of Bees in Eastern Tennessee

Margaret E. Clark, Laura Russo, Karl McKim, Amani Khalil
article en

Abstract

With the intensification of agricultural practices, bee habitats are undergoing changes, impacting the nutritional quality of resources available to bee larvae and leading to variation in adult body sizes. Because larger bee species can forage at greater distances from their nests, we predicted that intraspecific body size would respond differently to agricultural land use gradient depending on bee size at the species level. Our study emphasizes the effect of a varying agricultural land use gradient on adult body sizes of bees. Our experiment took place in East Tennessee where we established twenty plots each containing 18 native plant species, at five sites of varying agricultural land-uses, ranging from 6-48% agriculture. During the summer, using an insect vacuum, we collected 11,183 insects representing 99 bee species interacting with these native plants. We then haphazardly selected adult bees from 13 species that were found at all sites to measure their body size via intertegular distance (ITD). We found that the intraspecific adult body size of larger bees, such as Bombus impatiens, increased along with agricultural land use in the surrounding landscape. The body size of small and medium sized bee species did not change along the agricultural land use gradient. This indicates that agricultural land use affects bee species differently. Larger bees are able to forage at greater distances from their nests and carry more provisions, which might make them more resilient to agricultural land use. Smaller bees may be less resilient because they cannot forage as far. This is critical to consider for future landscape management practices to best ensure the pollination of crops. KEYWORDS: Pollinator Health; Wild Bees; Agriculture; Conservation; Spatial Ecology; Social Bees; Intertegular Distance; Land Use Change

American Journal of Undergraduate ResearchVol. 22(3)
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
AgResearch, Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.