Evaluation and comparison of OpenET models for estimating soil water depletion of irrigated alfalfa in Arizona

Growers in arid regions often estimate soil water depletion (D r ) of the root zone in making irrigation scheduling decisions. While growers might use soil water sensors, actual D r in fields may be only vaguely assessed. In this study, daily crop evapotranspiration (ET sat ) data from the six OpenET satellite-based models (ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop) and the OpenET ensemble were incorporated into a soil water balance (SWB) to estimate D r (D r sat ) for alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) within a 46-ha, center-pivot field in Buckeye, Arizona. A daily SWB for each model input the average ET sat data acquired at four locations for both 30-m and 90-m pixel sizes, assuming an alfalfa root-zone of 1.8-m. Net irrigation (I n ) inputs were based on gross irrigation amounts, modified for evaporation losses using weather data from the AZMET station in Buckeye. D r sat values were compared to the average observed root-zone D r (D r obs ), as determined at the four locations by neutron moisture meter measurements on 21 dates between 05/23/2023 and 12/11/2023. Cumulative values were 841 mm for I n plus effective precipitation, 776 mm (ALEXI/DisALEXI) to 1130 mm (SSEBop) for ET sat , and 816 mm of ET obtained by a seasonal SWB (ET swb ) based on the average change in D r obs (ΔD r obs ) from first to last measurements. Average D r obs fluctuated between 59 and 133 mm, and ΔD r obs was −25.0 ± 42.0 mm. Model variations in ET sat resulted in different estimates of D r sat and agreements, where mean bias error (MBE) ranged from ≈ -35 % (PT-JPL) to 195 % (SSEBop). Despite notable uncertainties in the SWB parameters and observed data, the SWB based on both the ensemble and ALEXI/DisALEXI ET sat capably tracked D r obs for most of the observations, excluding those made from late-July to mid-August. However, the best overall agreement was with the ensemble data, where differences between cumulative ET sat and ET swb and ΔD r sat and ΔD r obs were small, and MBE for D r sat was less than 9 % and 15 % at 30-m and 90-m pixels, respectively. Findings suggest that using the single value OpenET ensemble daily ET could be a reliable source for estimating the D r in arid climate alfalfa fields. • OpenET models were incorporated into a soil water balance to estimate daily soil water depletion (D r ) for alfalfa. • OpenET ensemble daily ET could be a reliable source for estimating D r in arid climate alfalfa fields. • Future arid-land studies on OpenET are recommended, especially for alfalfa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109850
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and comparison of OpenET models for estimating soil water depletion of irrigated alfalfa in Arizona

Elsayed Ahmed Elsadek, Kelly Robert Thorp, Eduardo Bautista, Said Attalah et al.
2 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
article

Evaluation and comparison of OpenET models for estimating soil water depletion of irrigated alfalfa in Arizona

Elsayed Ahmed Elsadek, Kelly Robert Thorp, Eduardo Bautista, Said Attalah, Peter Waller, Diaa Eldin M. Elshikha, Gerard W. Wall, Clinton F. Williams, Douglas J. Hunsaker, Ethan Orr
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Growers in arid regions often estimate soil water depletion (D r ) of the root zone in making irrigation scheduling decisions. While growers might use soil water sensors, actual D r in fields may be only vaguely assessed. In this study, daily crop evapotranspiration (ET sat ) data from the six OpenET satellite-based models (ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop) and the OpenET ensemble were incorporated into a soil water balance (SWB) to estimate D r (D r sat ) for alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) within a 46-ha, center-pivot field in Buckeye, Arizona. A daily SWB for each model input the average ET sat data acquired at four locations for both 30-m and 90-m pixel sizes, assuming an alfalfa root-zone of 1.8-m. Net irrigation (I n ) inputs were based on gross irrigation amounts, modified for evaporation losses using weather data from the AZMET station in Buckeye. D r sat values were compared to the average observed root-zone D r (D r obs ), as determined at the four locations by neutron moisture meter measurements on 21 dates between 05/23/2023 and 12/11/2023. Cumulative values were 841 mm for I n plus effective precipitation, 776 mm (ALEXI/DisALEXI) to 1130 mm (SSEBop) for ET sat , and 816 mm of ET obtained by a seasonal SWB (ET swb ) based on the average change in D r obs (ΔD r obs ) from first to last measurements. Average D r obs fluctuated between 59 and 133 mm, and ΔD r obs was −25.0 ± 42.0 mm. Model variations in ET sat resulted in different estimates of D r sat and agreements, where mean bias error (MBE) ranged from ≈ -35 % (PT-JPL) to 195 % (SSEBop). Despite notable uncertainties in the SWB parameters and observed data, the SWB based on both the ensemble and ALEXI/DisALEXI ET sat capably tracked D r obs for most of the observations, excluding those made from late-July to mid-August. However, the best overall agreement was with the ensemble data, where differences between cumulative ET sat and ET swb and ΔD r sat and ΔD r obs were small, and MBE for D r sat was less than 9 % and 15 % at 30-m and 90-m pixels, respectively. Findings suggest that using the single value OpenET ensemble daily ET could be a reliable source for estimating the D r in arid climate alfalfa fields. • OpenET models were incorporated into a soil water balance to estimate daily soil water depletion (D r ) for alfalfa. • OpenET ensemble daily ET could be a reliable source for estimating D r in arid climate alfalfa fields. • Future arid-land studies on OpenET are recommended, especially for alfalfa.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 320
Damietta University (EG), University of Arizona (US), U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (US), Farm Africa (GB), Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.