Toward Documenting The Impact of Teaching Cases: A Multidimensional Model

The impact of research has become an important topic for accredited business schools and faculty alike. And yet there is no uniform method to measure the impact of published teaching cases, and this presents challenges for faculty publishing in this domain. This paper presents multidimensional model, extending beyond citation rates, which business schools may use to evaluate a faculty member’s intellectual contributions related to teaching cases. The model focuses on four dimensions: a published teaching case, industry or government involvement, citations along with views and downloads, and classroom usage by an independent faculty member who is not a co-author. The authors argue that when all four criteria are present, a case is at its most comprehensive level of impact, but utilizing a subset of the criteria also results in impact for a case. Student focused assessment related to case utilization, as well as the implications of the model are also discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of case studies
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69521/jcs.v43i1.2
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Documenting The Impact of Teaching Cases: A Multidimensional Model

Cara Peters, Joyce Yound
Journal of case studies
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

Toward Documenting The Impact of Teaching Cases: A Multidimensional Model

Cara Peters, Joyce Yound
article en

Abstract

The impact of research has become an important topic for accredited business schools and faculty alike. And yet there is no uniform method to measure the impact of published teaching cases, and this presents challenges for faculty publishing in this domain. This paper presents multidimensional model, extending beyond citation rates, which business schools may use to evaluate a faculty member’s intellectual contributions related to teaching cases. The model focuses on four dimensions: a published teaching case, industry or government involvement, citations along with views and downloads, and classroom usage by an independent faculty member who is not a co-author. The authors argue that when all four criteria are present, a case is at its most comprehensive level of impact, but utilizing a subset of the criteria also results in impact for a case. Student focused assessment related to case utilization, as well as the implications of the model are also discussed.

Journal of case studiesVol. 43(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.